Indigenous rights and managed public land: a critical treaty analysis of parks and reserves in New Zealand
Identification
- Public canonical key
- radar:r-e2697badae129a11ccd939a01969fa22
- Authors
- Robin Quigg · Els Russell
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-14T02:40:44.239975+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-14T02:40:44.239975+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of Otago
Reported affiliation countries
NZ
Documentary abstract — original language
This research critically examines the extent to which the Reserves Act 1977, the primary legislative framework governing many parks and reserves, especially those associated with territorial local authorities, aligns with and upholds Indigenous Māori values and rights guaranteed under Te Tiriti o Waitangi, the Treaty of Waitangi. Using Critical Tiriti Analysis (CTA), a methodological approach developed by Indigenous Māori scholars, we assess the Act's responsiveness to Te Tiriti and explore opportunities to embed Māori perspectives in public land management. Our study highlights the colonial underpinnings of current governance and reveals how the implicit recognition of Te Tiriti in conservation law fails to honour Māori rights fully. We identify legislative gaps by analysing local government land management practices and national land database records and propose pathways for integrating Māori-led stewardship into parks and reserves governance. As Indigenous Māori researchers with lived experiences of land alienation, we position this work within broader conversations on decolonising and re-indigenising public land management. We argue that true partnership under Te Tiriti may require the uncoupling of Māori land from the Reserves Act 1977 to restore tino rangatiratanga (self-determination) of ancestral lands. Our research underscores the potential for parks and reserves to serve as sites of cultural and environmental restoration, enacting ahi kā and reinforcing the vital connection between Māori identity and whenua (land).
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- https://openalex.org/W4413612936
- DOI
- 10.1080/13549839.2025.2543308
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- article
- Source-reported types
- article
- Publishers
- Routledge
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1
Cite this reference
Robin Quigg; Els Russell. Indigenous rights and managed public land: a critical treaty analysis of parks and reserves in New Zealand. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2025.2543308
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Robin Quigg; Els Russell. (2025). Indigenous rights and managed public land: a critical treaty analysis of parks and reserves in New Zealand. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2025.2543308
- Chicago
- Robin Quigg; Els Russell. Indigenous rights and managed public land: a critical treaty analysis of parks and reserves in New Zealand. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2025.2543308
- ISO 690
- Robin Quigg; Els Russell. Indigenous rights and managed public land: a critical treaty analysis of parks and reserves in New Zealand. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2025.2543308
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Indigenous rights and managed public land: a critical treaty analysis of parks and reserves in New Zealand. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-e2697badae129a11ccd939a01969fa22/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2025.2543308
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.