UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

The politics of decentralisation and indigenous revivalism in Sulawesi, Indonesia

Identification

Public canonical key

openalex:w1591398425

Authors

Adam D. Tyson

Reported year

2008

Reported language

en

Source type

dissertation

First detected

2026-11-09T19:04:47.775752+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:04:47.775752+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

The political transition in May 1998 set the stage for the passing of Indonesia's framework decentralisation laws (numbers 22 and 25 of 1999). These laws include both political and technocratic efforts to devolve authority from the centre (Jakarta) to the peripheries. Contrary to expectations, enhanced public participation often takes the form of indigenous (adat) revivalism, a highly contested and contingent process linked to intensified political struggles and conflicts throughout the archipelago. This thesis considers the ways in which decentralisation and adat revivalism intersect by foregrounding specific, localised struggles for rights and recognition in Sulawesi,, eastern Indonesia. Year-long research for this thesis was conducted at national, provincial, and local levels, with an emphasis on case studies from the districts of Bulukumba, East Luwu, Gowa, Majene, North Luwu, Palopo, and Tana Toraja. The core chapters of this thesis suggest that the innate, primordial givens of indigenous communities are being selectively drawn upon, finely-tuned, and exemplified in the search for political rights and recognition. It is argued, therefore, that village communities are increasingly engaged in a process of "becoming indigenous, " a process largely driven, instrumentalised, and distorted by external actors such as NGO activists and legal advocates. Local disputes increasingly derive from the primary, exigent right of recognition, and then extend to remedial rights including customary tenure, resource entitlement, and the right to return to antedated systems of governance. In the era of decentralisation there is no unified, grand procedural strategy for dealing with the political challenges posed by adat revivalism. In response to the devolution of authority from Jakarta to the peripheries, however, the political contours of conflict mediation and dispute resolution are being reconfigured, and the roles of all protagonists are evolving (or regressing) accordingly.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W1591398425

HANDLE

10068/953046

Documentary context

Documentary family

Thesis

Source-reported types

dissertation

Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources

ID

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3

• Handle · https://hdl.handle.net/10068/953046
• Document · http://uilis.unsyiah.ac.id/opentheses/items/show/6806
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W1591398425

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.