UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

The Rationale of China’s Media Regulation Policy in the Process of the Institutional Transformation

Identification

Public canonical key
openalex:w7042945331
Authors
Weiguang, Wu
Reported year
2017
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:04:47.752763+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:04:47.752763+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

Through its institutional transformation, China’s media policy has features of both power-regulated societies and rights-regulated societies. The development of human societies is based on three dominant variables: competition, technology, and institutions. Throughout civilized history, human societies can be categorized into two types, either power-regulated societies or rights-regulated societies. The standard of categorization is based on different forces that coerce the social order of the society. The coercing force of power-regulated societies is rooted in the regime of power, such as authoritarianism or totalitarianism. Ancient China and the former Soviet Union are typical examples of such power-regulated societies. The coercing force of rights-regulated societies is rooted in the private rights of its citizens. Democratic societies like Great Britain and the United States are typical examples of rights-regulated societies. The morality and legitimacy of power-regulated societies are to maintain order and protect the regime of power, whereas rights-regulated societies work to protect private rights of the people. Therefore, media policy and regulations are fundamentally different in the two types of societies. Power-regulated societies use a power-controlled media model, and rights-regulated societies use a free media model. Today, China’s media policy is in the process of transforming from a state-controlled media model to a free media model and show features of both a power-regulated society and a rights-regulated society. China’s institutions have been transforming since the first exposure to globalization in the mid-nineteenth century. Over the last century, China has experience three institutional transformations: during the Xinhai revolution, the Cultural Revolution, and the reform and open policy. The current institutional transformation will change not only Chinese society, but will also impact the world. The more we understand this complicated process of transformation, the better we comprehend the rationality of media regulation policy in China.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W7042945331

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
CN

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Not recorded
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Weiguang, Wu. The Rationale of China’s Media Regulation Policy in the Process of the Institutional Transformation. 2017. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-df1e7bc4d5907bacd6ca7baf2e1534d1/

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Weiguang, Wu. (2017). The Rationale of China’s Media Regulation Policy in the Process of the Institutional Transformation. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-df1e7bc4d5907bacd6ca7baf2e1534d1/
Chicago
Weiguang, Wu. The Rationale of China’s Media Regulation Policy in the Process of the Institutional Transformation. 2017. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-df1e7bc4d5907bacd6ca7baf2e1534d1/
ISO 690
Weiguang, Wu. The Rationale of China’s Media Regulation Policy in the Process of the Institutional Transformation. 2017. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-df1e7bc4d5907bacd6ca7baf2e1534d1/

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. The Rationale of China’s Media Regulation Policy in the Process of the Institutional Transformation. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-df1e7bc4d5907bacd6ca7baf2e1534d1/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 58e66722821000c1 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.752763+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.752763+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.752763+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.752763+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

77273ab3e5db2f52 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.752763+00:00

0b63cd79c9744941 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.752763+00:00

713d8dba0cfac639 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.752763+00:00

58e66722821000c1 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.752763+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

CN ·

Weiguang, Wu

Source roles

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7042945331

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library