New Tools are Needed for Tracking Adherence to AI Model Behavioral Use Clauses
Identification
- Public canonical key
- radar:r-de9348fe5a4fcc6bbd21a12604ed7be8
- Authors
- Daniel McDuff · Tim Korjakow · Kevin Klyman · Danish Contractor
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- preprint
- First detected
- 2026-11-14T02:16:53.707393+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-14T02:16:53.707393+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
Foundation models have had a transformative impact on AI. A combination of large investments in research and development, growing sources of digital data for training, and architectures that scale with data and compute has led to models with powerful capabilities. Releasing assets is fundamental to scientific advancement and commercial enterprise. However, concerns over negligent or malicious uses of AI have led to the design of mechanisms to limit the risks of the technology. The result has been a proliferation of licenses with behavioral-use clauses and acceptable-use-policies that are increasingly being adopted by commonly used families of models (Llama, Gemma, Deepseek) and a myriad of smaller projects. We created and deployed a custom AI licenses generator to facilitate license creation and have quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed over 300 customized licenses created with this tool. Alongside this we analyzed 1.7 million models licenses on the HuggingFace model hub. Our results show increasing adoption of these licenses, interest in tools that support their creation and a convergence on common clause configurations. In this paper we take the position that tools for tracking adoption of, and adherence to, these licenses is the natural next step and urgently needed in order to ensure they have the desired impact of ensuring responsible use.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- https://openalex.org/W4416048095
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2505.22287
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- preprint
- Source-reported types
- preprint
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1
Cite this reference
Daniel McDuff; Tim Korjakow; Kevin Klyman; Danish Contractor. New Tools are Needed for Tracking Adherence to AI Model Behavioral Use Clauses. 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.22287
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Daniel McDuff; Tim Korjakow; Kevin Klyman; Danish Contractor. (2025). New Tools are Needed for Tracking Adherence to AI Model Behavioral Use Clauses. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.22287
- Chicago
- Daniel McDuff; Tim Korjakow; Kevin Klyman; Danish Contractor. New Tools are Needed for Tracking Adherence to AI Model Behavioral Use Clauses. 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.22287
- ISO 690
- Daniel McDuff; Tim Korjakow; Kevin Klyman; Danish Contractor. New Tools are Needed for Tracking Adherence to AI Model Behavioral Use Clauses. 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2505.22287
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. New Tools are Needed for Tracking Adherence to AI Model Behavioral Use Clauses. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-de9348fe5a4fcc6bbd21a12604ed7be8/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22287
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.