Rights of nature: a critical dialogue between law and environmental anthropology
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.4324/9781003469858-39
- Authors
- D. · A.
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en · eng
- Source type
- Part of book or chapter of book
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.864498+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-10T16:58:50.988948+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
This chapter serves to establish a critical dialogue on rights of nature (RoN) by combining various perspectives, in particular those of law and anthropology. RoN are often presented as an (or even “the”) answer to the global environmental and climate crisis. Indeed, they are often cherished as if they were a magic wand, saving nature by turning it from an object to a (legal) subject. However, our analysis – which looks at their global development, the understanding of (legal) personhood, related questions of indigeneity as well as notions of the Anthropos and the actual effects of RoN on the ground – shows that they are an oscillating and inter-relational concept. RoN are employed in different ways, for different goals, building on different theoretical bases. We should neither essentialize nor romanticize, but contextualize them and understand their benefits and limitations in achieving justice. Hence, while RoN might not be “the” answer, they have raised crucial questions, created new spaces for debate, and can, depending on circumstances, be a concrete tool to be used for environmental (or other) causes.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7131675457
- DOI
- 10.4324/9781003469858-39
- HANDLE
- 21.11116/0000-0013-0ED7-A
- OPENAIRE
- doi_________::b942a69431021939f3e672fad500f32e · od______1874::17698b5e2f1a1c2303765ef894b5cefc
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Book chapter
- Source-reported types
- Part of book or chapter of book · book-chapter
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Book bibliographic description
Access status unknown
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1 · Record 2
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003469858-39
- Document · https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0013-0ED7-A
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7131675457
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
D.; A.. Rights of nature: a critical dialogue between law and environmental anthropology. 2026. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003469858-39
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- D.; A.. (2026). Rights of nature: a critical dialogue between law and environmental anthropology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003469858-39
- Chicago
- D.; A.. Rights of nature: a critical dialogue between law and environmental anthropology. 2026. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003469858-39
- ISO 690
- D.; A.. Rights of nature: a critical dialogue between law and environmental anthropology. 2026. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003469858-39
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Rights of nature: a critical dialogue between law and environmental anthropology. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-dcd0e54f368fe0a0d73a1cd21cab9f7e/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 7fb49afac8f3d0aa · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:22.952655+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:28.281336+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:22.952655+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:28.281336+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:22.952655+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:28.281336+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:22.952655+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:28.281336+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:22.952655+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:28.281336+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:50.988948+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
eb22f7c81dc6f3bc · 2026-11-09T19:06:28.281336+00:00
de5da5461c2cf582 · 2026-11-09T19:06:28.281336+00:00
be7488ecc8fb3620 · 2026-11-09T19:06:28.281336+00:00
c75f292893b66df3 · 2026-11-10T16:58:50.988948+00:00
7fb49afac8f3d0aa · 2026-11-10T16:58:50.988948+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003469858-39
Discovery source · https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0013-0ED7-A
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7131675457
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.