UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

JUSTICE FLOWS HERE: A PIL FORRECLAIMING VAIGAIRIVER’S LEGACY THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL JURISPRUDENCE

Identification

Public canonical key

openalex:w7219999236

Authors

SOUMIYA NANDHINI M & AMEER ARAFATH B

Reported year

2026

Reported language

en

Source type

article

First detected

2026-11-09T19:14:22.169540+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:14:22.169540+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

The Vaigai River faces an unprecedented environmental catastrophe, with water quality degraded to ‘E-grade’ classification which is the lowest category suitable only for industrial use. This Public Interest Litigation, filed by Recycle Rangers which is an NGO that contributes to environmental well-being, presents a paradigmatic case for environmental justice in the Context of the Vaigai River crisis in Tamil Nadu, India. This petition challenges the systematic degradation of a vital water resource that serves over 2 million people across five districts, thereby causing the transformation from a lifeline into a source of environmental injustice and constitutional violation. The crisis arises from the discharge of untreated sewage at 177 locations, failure of sewerage infrastructure achieving only 40-50% treatment capacity and a discriminatory water release policy that prioritizes festival celebrations over fundamental human needs. This violates Articles 14, 21, 47, Yand 48A of the Constitution of India, creating a typical case for the enforcement of the Right to clean drinking water and sanitation as integral components of the Right to life. This petition argues on the grounds, primarily establishing that clean water and sanitation as enforceable fundamental rights under Article 21. Secondly, that the State’s failure to discharge constitutional duties under Articles 47 and 48A and statutory obligations under various environmental protection laws are evident in the ineffective sewage treatment and persistent gaps in sewerage infrastructure. This petition further challenges arbitrary water allocation policies leaving communities without potable water for most of the year, violates Article 14 which guarantees equality. It is further argued applying the Public Trust Doctrine to address riverbank encroachments while ensuring humanitarian rehabilitation and invoking the doctrine of continuous mandamus to address administrative inaction despite repeated judicial interventions. The PIL essentially integrates recent precedents on sanitation rights with river pollution thereby routing for a transformative constitutional framework linking individual dignity with collective environmental and public welfare. The petition relies upon the Uttarakhand High Court’s decision and establishment of rivers as juristic persons and the rights possessed by such entities against inadvertent pollution. The petition challenges the constitutional validity of festival- based and seasonal water allocation policies presenting an unprecedented constitutional critique of cultural priorities versus fundamental rights thereby creating a paradigm transformation of the approach towards environmental jurisprudence. This petition represents a strategic convergence of environmental law, fundamental rights jurisprudence, and social justice principles, positioning itself as a potential landmark case that would reshape India’s approach to River Conservation, Urban Sanitation, and the constitutional Right to clean water. The comprehensive factual foundation, supported by extensive scientific studies and documented governmental failures, provides the Supreme Court with a robust platform for delivering transformative environmental justice. This petition seeks comprehensive relief including mandatory sewage treatment infrastructure completion, establishment of year-round environmental flow, humane rehabilitation of riverbank settlements, and constituting an independent monitoring committee under Supreme Court supervision.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W7219999236

Documentary context

Documentary family

Scholarship

Source-reported types

article

Natural entities mentioned

River

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• Document · https://ssijr.org/index.php/index/article/view/51
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7219999236

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.