Institutionalizing global climate governance: Expertise, sovereignty, and scalar mismatch
Identification
- Public canonical key
- radar:r-d5bbd6c44c84335fa80bc4b7a050e100
- Authors
- Benjamin Kaplan Weinger
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-13T10:55:52.239743+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-13T10:55:52.239743+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of California, Los Angeles
Reported affiliation countries
US
Documentary abstract — original language
This article addresses the fundamental tension in global climate governance: the disjuncture between the planetary scale of the climate crisis, as framed by scientific knowledge, and the state-centric approach of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It analyzes the historical-institutional dynamics that have shaped the UNFCCC, drawing on archival materials from the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) and prior meetings to reveal how diverse authorities, forms of knowledge, and norms coalesced to privilege state sovereignty. This early institutionalization embedded enduring asymmetries of power and responsibility, particularly concerning the distribution of burdens and benefits between the Global North and South. These asymmetries continue to hinder the pursuit of climate justice, understood here not as a neutral principle but as a normative framework grounded in historical responsibility, distributive equity, and the rights of affected communities. These structural inequalities limit the potential for more transformative governance that challenges the existing uneven geopolitical order. The article shows how framing climate change as a matter to be addressed by sovereign states, while politically expedient, can sideline alternative paradigms rooted in historical responsibility, legal accountability, climate debt, and the regulation of non-state actors. This analysis contributes to contemporary debates on transforming global climate governance to enable more ecologically just and effective responses.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- https://openalex.org/W4410292095
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101236
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- article
- Source-reported types
- article
- Publishers
- Elsevier BV
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1
Cite this reference
Benjamin Kaplan Weinger. Institutionalizing global climate governance: Expertise, sovereignty, and scalar mismatch. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101236
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Benjamin Kaplan Weinger. (2025). Institutionalizing global climate governance: Expertise, sovereignty, and scalar mismatch. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101236
- Chicago
- Benjamin Kaplan Weinger. Institutionalizing global climate governance: Expertise, sovereignty, and scalar mismatch. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101236
- ISO 690
- Benjamin Kaplan Weinger. Institutionalizing global climate governance: Expertise, sovereignty, and scalar mismatch. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101236
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Institutionalizing global climate governance: Expertise, sovereignty, and scalar mismatch. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-d5bbd6c44c84335fa80bc4b7a050e100/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101236
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.