Embodying knowledge
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1017/cbo9780511519451.006
- Authors
- Daniel Brewer
- Reported year
- 1993
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- book-chapter
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:16:56.591578+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:16:56.591578+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of Minnesota
Documentary abstract — original language
Si quelqu'un a aboli la distinction platonicienne-chrétienne entre le haut du corps qui contemple et le bas du corps qui désire, c'est bien Diderot. Elisabeth de Fontenay In her study of modern scientific discourse, E. F. Keller argues that any discourse of knowledge, including that of science, is libidinally determined. “Without mediation, commonality, or intercourse between subject and object, knowledge is not possible. One of the most common metaphors in Western history for such mediation has been the sexual relation: knowledge is a form of consummation, just as sex is a form of knowledge. Both are propelled by desire.” Moreover, modern scientific knowledge does not reflect upon what drives it as desire. Rather, to found its values, criteria, and practices, it appeals to an “objectivist ideology” designed to preserve the scientist's anonymity, disinterestedness, and impersonality, as well as the neutrality of his or her discourse. But in doing so, it reveals all the more its desire to become a totally “objective” science, possessing an ideal knowledge of objects that would transcend the body and the material in general. Science dreams of an autonomous and objectified subject of science, a subject disconnected from the world of other subjects and from their own subjectivity by the discursive act that represents them as “objects.” In sum, the objectivity of modern scientific knowledge results from its sublimation of a body of desires and its refusal to consider the discourse through which they are channeled. The Enlightenment's development of techniques for mastering the objects of nature marks one of the beginnings of the scientific modernity Keller analyzes.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4249133325
- DOI
- 10.1017/cbo9780511519451.006
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Book chapter
- Source-reported types
- book-chapter
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Book bibliographic description
Access status unknown
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Daniel Brewer. Embodying knowledge. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511519451.006
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Daniel Brewer. (1993). Embodying knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511519451.006
- Chicago
- Daniel Brewer. Embodying knowledge. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511519451.006
- ISO 690
- Daniel Brewer. Embodying knowledge. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511519451.006
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Embodying knowledge. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-d5a608f3a7d8ae103f23bcac3b7faf82/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version c0767f3a56dfb6e7 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:56.591578+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:56.591578+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:56.591578+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:56.591578+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:56.591578+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
ad0446ebc9446af8 · 2026-11-09T19:16:56.591578+00:00
01f06a484bf43eff · 2026-11-09T19:16:56.591578+00:00
492df88c90e54f65 · 2026-11-09T19:16:56.591578+00:00
c0767f3a56dfb6e7 · 2026-11-09T19:16:56.591578+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511519451.006
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4249133325
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.