UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

William Blake and the Body (review)

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.1353/lit.2004.0022
Authors
Jeffrey
Reported year
2004
Reported language
en · eng
Source type
Article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:10:41.166889+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:10:41.166889+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

Connolly, Tristanne J. 2002. William Blake and the Body. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. $65.00 hc. xvii + 249 pp.Anyone familiar with the works of William Blake, particularly his later epic poetry, must be aware of the centrality of the body in both his engraved and poetic images. Bodies and parts of bodies are displayed in a variety of grotesque manners throughout the illuminated texts. However, this area of Blake's aesthetic has been, for the most part, relatively glossed over or simply ignored. In 1974, Anne K. Mellor published Blake's Human Form Divine, and that text remained the first and last word on the subject, until now. Tristanne J. Connolly provides a valuable and long overdue service to Blake scholarship in her aptly named book, William Blake and the Body.By reexamining Blake's corpus under the light of more recent theorists such as Julia Kristeva, Mary Douglas, Alicia Ostriker, Elaine Scarry and Barbara Stafford, Connolly identifies the cultural influences that shaped Blake's conception of the body and examines his dialectic with the body over the course of his career, focusing primarily on the later epics. The task of explicating any subject of Blake's can be daunting, in part because of the notorious difficulty and obscurity of much of Blake's work, but also because he had a very ambiguous attitude towards the human body. He saw the body as simultaneously liberating and enslaving and, instead of attempting to reconcile these contradictions, he reveled in the paradoxes and complexities of embodiment throughout his artistic career. In her preface, Connolly writes, "The body is Blake's preoccupation not because of a confident admiration of it, but rather a troubled obsession. He has a love/hate relationship with his favourite image; he at once reviles and glorifies the human body" (2002, vii). At the root of this ambiguity is the core of Blake's philosophical and aesthetic thought; and it is because of this complex multiplicity that the body is such an important, yet thorny, subject in understanding Blake.Connolly's book is divided into seven chapters that trace the roots of Blake's anatomical knowledge and follow its threads through his most complicated works. The first two look at textual and graphic depictions of bodies and the metaphor of the body as text and graph. The next two analyze the problem of embodiment in Blake's illuminated texts, particularly focusing on the birth and miscarriage imagery that dominates The First Book of Urizen (1795) (Connolly's close reading of this poem is enlightening in its own right) and Blake's magnum opus, Jerusalem (c. 1804-1820). The following two chapters examine the proliferation of dividing and commingling bodies in Blake's texts and negotiate the boundaries of the body while elucidating such problematic Blakean terms as "emanation" and "spectre." The final chapter outlines and theorizes the lineaments of the eternal body from which all other bodies flow. Thus, Connolly's book moves concentrically outward from the minute particulars of individual embodiment to the universalizations of the eternal body, highlighting their continuity and illustrating Blake's lifelong project of reconciling the individual with the larger community.By contextualizing Blake's work within the tradition of anatomy and engraving (practiced by some of Blake's contemporaries and friends such as William Cowper and John and William Hunter) and by placing him-as an engraver-within the parameters of the ongoing debate on theories of the artistic representation of nature, Connolly provides a strong historical foundation to Blake's aesthetic theory and method. …

Identifiers

DOI
10.1353/lit.2004.0022
OPENAIRE
doi_dedup___::986e76898cca86d31b675ed2f9dfd64a

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
Article

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAIRE · Record 1

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Not recorded
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Jeffrey. William Blake and the Body (review). 2004. https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2004.0022

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Jeffrey. (2004). William Blake and the Body (review). https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2004.0022
Chicago
Jeffrey. William Blake and the Body (review). 2004. https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2004.0022
ISO 690
Jeffrey. William Blake and the Body (review). 2004. https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2004.0022

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. William Blake and the Body (review). Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-c5d4f581e16333c67acd8cb0ece4e19e/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 3404ed1d7e8ba526 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:41.166889+00:00
Authors
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:41.166889+00:00
Year
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:41.166889+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:41.166889+00:00
Source URL
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:41.166889+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

b195ceeb9cdf58ce · 2026-11-09T19:10:41.166889+00:00

dcd190c2d6f54fde · 2026-11-09T19:10:41.166889+00:00

082ef65ced5d7b9a · 2026-11-09T19:10:41.166889+00:00

3404ed1d7e8ba526 · 2026-11-09T19:10:41.166889+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

Jeffrey

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2004.0022

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library