El reconocimiento de la naturaleza como sujeto de derechos por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. La opinión consultiva OC-32/25
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.36151/redi.78.1.7
- Authors
- Guillermo Moya Barba
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.692531+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:13:04.822274+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Reported affiliation countries
ES
Documentary abstract — original language
The international movement for the rights of nature advocates the protection of the natural environment through the granting of legal personality to its elements. In Latin America, there are numerous cases in which ecosystems have been granted legal personality, sometimes as a result of the struggle to defend the rights of indigenous peoples. However, formal recognition of the rights of nature in a regional or larger instrument seemed to be a much more distant goal. However, in 2025 the Inter- American Court of Human Rights, in an advisory opinion on the obligations of States in the face of climate emergency took a step forward in this regard. The purpose of this article is to offer a descriptive and analytical examination of the content of Advisory Opinion OC-32/25 of the IACHR in relation to the recognition of the rights of nature in the Latin American region, since it is the first decision of a regional body that makes express mention of this movement and, therefore, has aroused great interest among the main proponents of this paradigm.
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.36151/redi.78.1.7
- OPENALEX
- W7170364207
- OPENAIRE
- doi_________::60ca37245764ba8cb725313115a70a3f
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- REGIONAL_LATIN_AMERICA
- Source jurisdiction labels
- Amérique latine
- Publishers
- Revista Española de Derecho Internacional
- Natural entities mentioned
- Ecosystem
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.36151/redi.78.1.7
- Document · https://www.sybil.es/redi/es/article/view/4772
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7170364207
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Documentary source reported
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Documentary source reported
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Guillermo Moya Barba. El reconocimiento de la naturaleza como sujeto de derechos por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. La opinión consultiva OC-32/25. 2026. https://doi.org/10.36151/redi.78.1.7
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Guillermo Moya Barba. (2026). El reconocimiento de la naturaleza como sujeto de derechos por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. La opinión consultiva OC-32/25. https://doi.org/10.36151/redi.78.1.7
- Chicago
- Guillermo Moya Barba. El reconocimiento de la naturaleza como sujeto de derechos por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. La opinión consultiva OC-32/25. 2026. https://doi.org/10.36151/redi.78.1.7
- ISO 690
- Guillermo Moya Barba. El reconocimiento de la naturaleza como sujeto de derechos por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. La opinión consultiva OC-32/25. 2026. https://doi.org/10.36151/redi.78.1.7
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. El reconocimiento de la naturaleza como sujeto de derechos por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. La opinión consultiva OC-32/25. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-c27469cf4cbc6d622ce06ccc9fcd57ae/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version d449aba8d747e798 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- Historical documentary evidence · source · 2026-11-07
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:27.932209+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:27.932209+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:04.822274+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:27.932209+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:04.822274+00:00 - Jurisdiction
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.692531+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:27.932209+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:04.822274+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- Historical documentary evidence · source · 2026-11-07
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:27.932209+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:04.822274+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
3c2557269071477a · 2026-11-09T19:13:04.822274+00:00
1ccf23af585b54b9 · 2026-11-09T19:13:04.822274+00:00
3f36b3ec5800af69 · 2026-11-09T19:13:04.822274+00:00
d449aba8d747e798 · 2026-11-09T19:13:04.822274+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.36151/redi.78.1.7
Discovery source · https://www.sybil.es/redi/es/article/view/4772
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7170364207
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.