Groundhog Day at the 2024 United Nations biodiversity conference: What COP 16 can teach us for reforming environmental summits
Identification
- Public canonical key
- radar:r-bfcd6a317c8a3a2cc7c4fe5f70ed3264
- Authors
- Fariborz Zelli
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-14T09:05:12.743145+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-14T09:05:12.743145+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Lund University
Reported affiliation countries
SE
Documentary abstract — original language
With 23,000 registered participants and unprecedented media attention, the 16th conference of the parties (COP) to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in Cali, Colombia, was the largest in the 32-year history of these biannual meetings. In terms of successes, the Cali conference established a new subsidiary body to protect concerns of indigenous communities and local populations as defenders of nature, along with a new voluntary mechanism on benefit-sharing. The Cali COP may also be remembered for its civil society zone which turned into a vibrant platform of social and cultural encounters. On a more critical note though, negotiations in Cali shared the fate of the climate COP in Baku just two weeks later and, arguably, of inflated environmental summits in general. They were slowed down by typical bargaining strategies and stalemates and failed to address crucial implementation, financing and review gaps. While the conference was suspended unceremoniously on November 2, 2024, the much more concise resumed sessions in December 2024 and February 2025 achieved crucial breakthroughs on these matters. A lesson learned from these turnarounds is to complement larger COPs more regularly with smaller and solution-oriented meetings with decision-making power – instead of using such formats only for firefighting. Moreover, to avoid exaggerated greenwashing and lobbying like in Cali, future COPs should exhibit a more equitable representation of non-governmental actors and benefit from a more careful selection process of conference venues.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- https://openalex.org/W4410538117
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.esg.2025.100259
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- article
- Source-reported types
- article
- Publishers
- Elsevier BV
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1
Cite this reference
Fariborz Zelli. Groundhog Day at the 2024 United Nations biodiversity conference: What COP 16 can teach us for reforming environmental summits. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100259
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Fariborz Zelli. (2025). Groundhog Day at the 2024 United Nations biodiversity conference: What COP 16 can teach us for reforming environmental summits. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100259
- Chicago
- Fariborz Zelli. Groundhog Day at the 2024 United Nations biodiversity conference: What COP 16 can teach us for reforming environmental summits. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100259
- ISO 690
- Fariborz Zelli. Groundhog Day at the 2024 United Nations biodiversity conference: What COP 16 can teach us for reforming environmental summits. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100259
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Groundhog Day at the 2024 United Nations biodiversity conference: What COP 16 can teach us for reforming environmental summits. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-bfcd6a317c8a3a2cc7c4fe5f70ed3264/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100259
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.