Equity in REDD+: Varying logics in Tanzania
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1002/eet.1669
- Authors
- Salla Rantala · Tiina Kontinen · Kaisa Korhonen‐Kurki · Irmeli Mustalahti
- Reported year
- 2015
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Center for International Forestry Research · University of Eastern Finland · University of Helsinki · University of Jyväskylä
Documentary abstract — original language
Abstract Equity is frequently cited as one of the key design aspects of environmental governance regimes. In the context of Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), a forest‐based climate change mitigation instrument, the manner in which ‘equity’ is understood will be of critical importance for the impacts and acceptance of REDD + policies and initiatives. Whereas the concept has been extensively studied in the academic literature, references to equity in REDD + policy debates and documents are often vague, leaving room for various interpretations and modes of implementation. In our case study of the Tanzanian national REDD + policy domain, we provide a conceptual framework based on an institutional logics approach for analysing the various underlying rationalities in the ‘equity in REDD+’ debate. We apply it to demonstrate how the involved policy actors draw from heterogeneous equity logics in their support for and opposition to different governance models, highlighting the importance of precise contextualization and operationalization of broad international principles in national REDD + initiatives. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W1541224723
- DOI
- 10.1002/eet.1669
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- TZ
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w137704532 · CITES
- Forests for people: community rights and forest tenure reform · CITES
- openalex:w1501662969 · CITES
- openalex:w1553286440 · CITES
- openalex:w170352878 · CITES
- Approaches to benefit sharing: A preliminary comparative analysis of 13 REDD+ countries · CITES
- openalex:w1911179771 · CITES
- openalex:w1936641528 · CITES
- openalex:w1965278510 · CITES
- openalex:w1979266690 · CITES
- openalex:w1979922701 · CITES
- openalex:w1988358854 · CITES
- openalex:w1993663609 · CITES
- openalex:w2001543067 · CITES
- openalex:w2007990503 · CITES
- openalex:w2011222823 · CITES
- openalex:w2020969191 · CITES
- openalex:w2022189364 · CITES
- openalex:w2028635986 · CITES
- openalex:w2034242732 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Salla Rantala; Tiina Kontinen; Kaisa Korhonen‐Kurki; Irmeli Mustalahti. Equity in REDD+: Varying logics in Tanzania. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1669
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Salla Rantala; Tiina Kontinen; Kaisa Korhonen‐Kurki; Irmeli Mustalahti. (2015). Equity in REDD+: Varying logics in Tanzania. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1669
- Chicago
- Salla Rantala; Tiina Kontinen; Kaisa Korhonen‐Kurki; Irmeli Mustalahti. Equity in REDD+: Varying logics in Tanzania. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1669
- ISO 690
- Salla Rantala; Tiina Kontinen; Kaisa Korhonen‐Kurki; Irmeli Mustalahti. Equity in REDD+: Varying logics in Tanzania. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1669
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Equity in REDD+: Varying logics in Tanzania. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-bf9adaad9b7f1d76b920286db49fb7d6/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 6166d0856ebc66b4 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
d5c7bfefbbb72ae1 · 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
506f41690778f1d0 · 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
45eafb0fa7d19153 · 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
6166d0856ebc66b4 · 2026-11-09T19:16:51.640087+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
TZ ·
Center for International Forestry Research
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1669
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W1541224723
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.