Biocracy and the 2030 Agenda: a systemic ecological governance framework for accelerating progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.3389/fpos.2026.1988913
- Authors
- Anand Gaurav
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.763974+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-10T13:56:29.728900+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University
Reported affiliation countries
IN
Documentary abstract — original language
A decade after adoption of the 2030 Agenda, progress remains insufficient and uneven, while implementation continues to be constrained by fragmented institutions, policy trade-offs, short political time horizons and weak translation of ecological limits into routine governance. This conceptual analysis develops Biocracy as a systemic ecological governance framework for addressing that implementation problem. Biocracy is defined as “Government of the living, by the living, for the living” and organises governance around ten principles concerning non-human rights and representation, ecological limits on demographic and spatial pressure, resource use and waste, regenerative agriculture, ecological socialisation, bio-compatible settlement and local stewardship. The article advances earlier Biocracy publications by converting preliminary principle–SDG associations into a mechanism-based and testable framework. Three types of relationship are distinguished: direct causal, indirect causal and enabling institutional. Five pathways of potential acceleration are then specified: preventive, institutional, systems, behavioural and subsidiarity/proximity acceleration. The analysis further identifies an institutional chain linking ecological recognition and representation to adaptive limits, executive coordination, adjudication, monitoring and corrective feedback. Two analytical tables consolidate the principle–SDG pathways and propose observable indicators for future assessment. The argument is deliberately conditional: because no complete Biocratic state has been implemented, the article does not claim that Biocracy has already accelerated SDG outcomes. It instead establishes a theoretically coherent governance hypothesis whose mechanisms can be examined through comparative, longitudinal and process-tracing research. The principal contribution is to connect SDG policy coherence with ecological constitutionalisation and feedback-responsive governance, thereby treating the conditions that sustain life as an organising constraint on development rather than as a separate environmental policy sector.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7225407961
- DOI
- 10.3389/fpos.2026.1988913
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects · CITES
- openalex:w1696284990 · CITES
- openalex:w2111030512 · CITES
- openalex:w2165702945 · CITES
- openalex:w2169619085 · CITES
- openalex:w2263532705 · CITES
- openalex:w2432612777 · CITES
- openalex:w2484133022 · CITES
- Environment, Political Representation and the Challenge of Rights: Speaking for Nature · CITES
- openalex:w2591909885 · CITES
- openalex:w2754188965 · CITES
- openalex:w2771168782 · CITES
- openalex:w2884562313 · CITES
- openalex:w2928452017 · CITES
- openalex:w2941705808 · CITES
- openalex:w3035679966 · CITES
- The Politics of Rights of Nature: Strategies for Building a More Sustainable Future · CITES
- openalex:w4211047673 · CITES
- openalex:w4233654598 · CITES
- openalex:w4243887731 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Anand Gaurav. Biocracy and the 2030 Agenda: a systemic ecological governance framework for accelerating progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals. 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1988913
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Anand Gaurav. (2026). Biocracy and the 2030 Agenda: a systemic ecological governance framework for accelerating progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1988913
- Chicago
- Anand Gaurav. Biocracy and the 2030 Agenda: a systemic ecological governance framework for accelerating progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals. 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1988913
- ISO 690
- Anand Gaurav. Biocracy and the 2030 Agenda: a systemic ecological governance framework for accelerating progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals. 2026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1988913
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Biocracy and the 2030 Agenda: a systemic ecological governance framework for accelerating progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-bf07c4848a0f4df114f849730dafa5dd/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version e0cc401f04f4a67f · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T13:56:29.728900+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T13:56:29.728900+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T13:56:29.728900+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T13:56:29.728900+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T13:56:29.728900+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
6074602b50436264 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.763974+00:00
0b1b6ff989237b3f · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.763974+00:00
df569d66791ca28c · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.763974+00:00
37eb12d7604aca84 · 2026-11-10T13:56:29.728900+00:00
e0cc401f04f4a67f · 2026-11-10T13:56:29.728900+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2026.1988913
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7225407961
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.