UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Mapping Disabled Justice: Empirical Research Towards a People-Centered Approach

Identification

Public canonical key

openalex:w7159909440

Authors

Qudsiya Naqui

Reported year

2026

Reported language

en

Source type

article

First detected

2026-11-09T19:04:47.709076+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:04:47.709076+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

University of the District of Columbia

Reported affiliation countries

US

Documentary abstract — original language

This paper reviews access to justice for people with disabilities, focusing on what we know—and still need to know—about how justice systems can better serve and include disabled populations. Based on existing research, we know that disabled people, constituting roughly 16% of the global population, face significant legal, informational, communication, physical, and economic barriers at all stages of the justice process, and are disproportionately represented in both civil and criminal legal systems. We also know that these barriers impede disabled people’s access to the law, access to legal processes, and access to just outcomes, undermining their ability to engage in democracy, emerge from poverty, and participate in inclusive development. Legal needs surveys in various countries have found that disabled people are more likely to report civil justice problems, while research on legal empowerment reveals that disabled individuals face obstacles in accessing legal information, exercising legal capacity, and obtaining representation due to inaccessible materials, social isolation, and negative attitudes among justice system actors. However, important questions remain around the long-term procedural and substantive outcomes of disabled people navigating legal problems, the efficacy of interventions such as supported decision-making, and the implementation of accessibility policies across justice institutions. Significant data gaps also persist: existing methodologies for identifying disability in surveys often exclude psychosocial and developmental disabilities; research is overwhelmingly concentrated on criminal rather than civil justice contexts; and few justice institutions have developed standardized approaches to collecting disability-disaggregated data. Drawing on international frameworks including the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, legal needs surveys, and qualitative research, this paper argues that centering the experiences of disabled people advances people-centered justice for all communities, and concludes with a proposed research agenda emphasizing participatory methodologies, data linkage strategies, and cross-jurisdictional evidence building. In Global Perspectives on People-Centered Justice: Exploring the Evidence, Matthew Burnett & Rebecca L. Sandefur eds., American Bar Foundation (2026).

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W7159909440

Documentary context

Documentary family

Scholarship

Source-reported types

article

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1

• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7159909440

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

• openalex:w2044307802 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.