Eco-Criticism and the Crisis of Representation in Postmodern Narratives
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.18738552
- Authors
- Maruti Hadkar
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:10:21.106786+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:10:28.045225+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Department for Education · NSW Department of Education
Documentary abstract — original language
Abstract Eco-criticism has emerged as a significant theoretical framework that examines the relationship between literature and the physical environment. In the context of postmodern narratives, the representation of nature undergoes a profound transformation, marked by fragmentation, irony, intertextuality, and skepticism toward grand narratives. This paper explores how postmodern literature reflects ecological anxiety while simultaneously problematizing the very act of representing nature. Drawing upon theoretical insights from Lawrence Buell, Cheryll Glotfelty, and Jean-François Lyotard, the study examines selected postmodern texts to demonstrate how environmental crises are intertwined with representational crises. The paper argues that postmodern narrative strategies—metafiction, fragmentation, magical realism, and narrative self-reflexivity—both reveal and complicate ecological realities. Ultimately, eco-criticism in postmodernism highlights the tension between environmental urgency and linguistic instability, urging readers to reconsider how literature mediates ecological consciousness.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7131067281
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.18738552
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::16639b3b440ad728669ce4f63dd4a150
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1 · Record 2
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18738552
- Document · https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18738552
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7131067281
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Maruti Hadkar. Eco-Criticism and the Crisis of Representation in Postmodern Narratives. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18738552
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Maruti Hadkar. (2026). Eco-Criticism and the Crisis of Representation in Postmodern Narratives. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18738552
- Chicago
- Maruti Hadkar. Eco-Criticism and the Crisis of Representation in Postmodern Narratives. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18738552
- ISO 690
- Maruti Hadkar. Eco-Criticism and the Crisis of Representation in Postmodern Narratives. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18738552
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Eco-Criticism and the Crisis of Representation in Postmodern Narratives. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-ba0b1e6e14a6651bbd60a1914aa58b21/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version ff31e8654b293220 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:28.045225+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:21.106786+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:28.045225+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:21.106786+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:28.045225+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:21.106786+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:28.045225+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:21.106786+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:28.045225+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:21.106786+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
6111b98ad0951058 · 2026-11-09T19:10:28.045225+00:00
6144b3a87a345f4b · 2026-11-09T19:10:28.045225+00:00
c64ef85e8d032322 · 2026-11-09T19:10:28.045225+00:00
ff31e8654b293220 · 2026-11-09T19:10:28.045225+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18738552
Discovery source · https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18738552
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7131067281
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.