Does Nature Need Rights?
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.2139/ssrn.5318971
- Authors
- Lael K · Robert
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- en · und
- Source type
- Article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.668377+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:06:53.194099+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
The University of Melbourne · The University of Queensland
Reported affiliation countries
AU
Documentary abstract — original language
Rights of nature (RoN) appear to provide a promising alternative to anthropocentric environmental rights. But do they meet the demands of transformative green constitutionalist projects? This article addresses that question by examining the juridical dimensions of RoN. We draw on empirical studies of RoN laws to identify and examine the challenges of redeploying 'rights' and 'legal personality'-concepts associated with liberal normative frameworks-in the service of green normative theory and its fundamental concern for ecological well-being. We reject the dominant rights-based paradigm, which locates the green potential of RoN laws in constituting nature as a rights-bearing legal subject, and we propose an alternative: the governance paradigm. Our alternative locates the green potential of RoN laws in reconfiguring authority relations and supports ecocentric legal frameworks instead of RoN: emphasising ecocentric values and duties instead of rights, and ecological community membership instead of legal personhood.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4411629813
- DOI
- 10.2139/ssrn.5318971
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::f8eb5027714496fe072bc1d903423caf
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · preprint
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Publisher / institutional publication record · Record 1
- Publisher / institutional publication record · https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf021
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5318971
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4411629813
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
3 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Provenance unresolved
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Instrument versions and official source
Source unresolved
Documentary identity verification only: a link or date establishes neither full-text verification, legal effect nor current force.
Possible duplicate awaiting documentary verification.
Status from the preserved documentary extraction: Unestablished
Cite this reference
Lael K; Robert. Does Nature Need Rights?. 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5318971
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Lael K; Robert. (2025). Does Nature Need Rights?. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5318971
- Chicago
- Lael K; Robert. Does Nature Need Rights?. 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5318971
- ISO 690
- Lael K; Robert. Does Nature Need Rights?. 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5318971
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Does Nature Need Rights?. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-add127a57b51de60cd5ddd9ed2ae2dd8/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version c597acd7819ca05e · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:53.194099+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:59.926075+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:53.194099+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:59.926075+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:53.194099+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:59.926075+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:53.194099+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:59.926075+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:53.194099+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:59.926075+00:00 - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:59.926075+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:59.926075+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
f9ff9fd16b944ca4 · 2026-11-09T19:06:53.194099+00:00
653b4c6aef74236f · 2026-11-09T19:06:53.194099+00:00
8b5b8e80135e342a · 2026-11-09T19:06:53.194099+00:00
c597acd7819ca05e · 2026-11-09T19:06:53.194099+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf021
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5318971
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4411629813
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.