UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

The Politics of Robotic Telepresence: Can Media be Considered a Person? With a Focus on a South Korean Case

Identification

Public canonical key

openalex:w2405186904

Authors

Ilhan Bae

Reported year

2015

Reported language

en

Source type

dissertation

First detected

2026-11-09T19:04:47.919207+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:04:47.919207+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

This dissertation explores the key concept that media can be treated as a legal person. Telepresence robots, the medium of video conferencing on robot platform are treated as de facto persons with legal agency, as if the distant robot operator is actually present in the workplace. After reviewing how definitions of personhood in history have expanded from only male adults to including non-human entities such as corporations, the author suggests that the legal concept of person as a subject with rights should be applied to the human-telepresence robot that performs the roles of real persons. To establish the possibility of recognizing the human-telepresence robot as a legal person with rights, an experiment was implemented in South Korea to investigate whether human-telepresence robots would be perceived to deserve more civil and political rights than human-media without maneuverability. On average, the participants' responses to accepting the human-telepresence robot as a legal subject are not negative as regards most civil and political rights. Also, the degree of support for the rights of the human-telepresence robot is higher than for the human-media without maneuverability. It means that a telepresence robot controlled by a person is regarded as a subject deserving a considerable level of legal capacity, which has been not implementable in previous media environments. Given that a legal person can be defined as a legal subject with rights and duties, it seems reasonable to consider the medium of telepresence robots which extend the legal capacity and rights of a person in real time as another form of legal person.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W2405186904

HANDLE

10125/50956

Documentary context

Documentary family

Thesis

Source-reported types

dissertation

Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources

KR

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3

• Document · http://hdl.handle.net/10125/50956
• Handle · https://hdl.handle.net/10125/50956
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2405186904

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.