El neoconstitucionalismo andino. Estudio comparado de las Constituciones de Ecuador 2008 y Bolivia 2009 a la luz del Convenio 169 y la Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los pueblos indígenas / Andean neoconstitutionalism. A comparative study of Ecuador’s and Bolivia’s Constitutions of 2008 and 2009, respectively, in light of Convention 169 and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
Identification
- Public canonical key
- radar:r-a7fd86be4b2e68211f668b1362e9acaa
- Authors
- Hernán
- Reported year
- 2015
- Reported language
- und · esl/spa
- Source type
- Other ORP type
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:06:04.511068+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:07:01.651831+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
Ecuador’s Constitution of 2008 recognizes the rights of nature and the rights of indigenous people who benefit from its natural resources, to further sumak kawsay or buen vivir (well-being or “good life”) within the framework of people’s right to self-determination. On the other hand, the Bolivian Constitution of 2009 considers “native indigenous campesinos” as a collective of the plurinational nation and suma qamaña as the transversal axis of its new Constitution. This research seeks to compare the constitutional texts of both countries by means of ten variables and with reference to Convention 169 concerning indigenous and tribal peoples in independent countries, and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. La Constitución ecuatoriana de 2008 reconoce a la naturaleza sujeto de derechos y a los pueblos indígenas beneficiarios de los recursos que permiten el sumak kawsay en el marco de la libre determinación de los pueblos. Por su parte, la Constitución boliviana de 2009, asume al “indígena originario campesino” sujeto colectivo del Estado plurinacional, y el suma qamaña se constituye en eje transversal de su nueva Constitución. Esta investigación busca relacionar el texto constitucional de estos dos Estados a través de diez variables, tomando de referencia al Convenio 169 sobre pueblos indígenas y tribales en países independientes, y la Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre derechos de los pueblos indígenas.
Identifiers
- OPENAIRE
- od______3056::8ad6637d53f6fed1d4ca2a782b6aa74d
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Other
- Source-reported types
- Other ORP type
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- BO · EC
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Not recorded
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Hernán. El neoconstitucionalismo andino. Estudio comparado de las Constituciones de Ecuador 2008 y Bolivia 2009 a la luz del Convenio 169 y la Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los pueblos indígenas / Andean neoconstitutionalism. A comparative study of Ecuador’s and Bolivia’s Constitutions of 2008 and 2009, respectively, in light of Convention 169 and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 2015. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a7fd86be4b2e68211f668b1362e9acaa/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Hernán. (2015). El neoconstitucionalismo andino. Estudio comparado de las Constituciones de Ecuador 2008 y Bolivia 2009 a la luz del Convenio 169 y la Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los pueblos indígenas / Andean neoconstitutionalism. A comparative study of Ecuador’s and Bolivia’s Constitutions of 2008 and 2009, respectively, in light of Convention 169 and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a7fd86be4b2e68211f668b1362e9acaa/
- Chicago
- Hernán. El neoconstitucionalismo andino. Estudio comparado de las Constituciones de Ecuador 2008 y Bolivia 2009 a la luz del Convenio 169 y la Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los pueblos indígenas / Andean neoconstitutionalism. A comparative study of Ecuador’s and Bolivia’s Constitutions of 2008 and 2009, respectively, in light of Convention 169 and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 2015. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a7fd86be4b2e68211f668b1362e9acaa/
- ISO 690
- Hernán. El neoconstitucionalismo andino. Estudio comparado de las Constituciones de Ecuador 2008 y Bolivia 2009 a la luz del Convenio 169 y la Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los pueblos indígenas / Andean neoconstitutionalism. A comparative study of Ecuador’s and Bolivia’s Constitutions of 2008 and 2009, respectively, in light of Convention 169 and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 2015. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a7fd86be4b2e68211f668b1362e9acaa/
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. El neoconstitucionalismo andino. Estudio comparado de las Constituciones de Ecuador 2008 y Bolivia 2009 a la luz del Convenio 169 y la Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los pueblos indígenas / Andean neoconstitutionalism. A comparative study of Ecuador’s and Bolivia’s Constitutions of 2008 and 2009, respectively, in light of Convention 169 and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a7fd86be4b2e68211f668b1362e9acaa/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version a6a07e401a692252 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.651831+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.651831+00:00
- Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.651831+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.651831+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.651831+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
0cdd446d7aad84c4 · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.651831+00:00
ba3fc5cd9613570d · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.651831+00:00
be4a63a9a1018e21 · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.651831+00:00
a6a07e401a692252 · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.651831+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Institutional bibliographic repository · http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/8579
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.