A comparative legal analysis of avatar identity and regulatory gaps in virtual reality environments
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103314
- Authors
- Adel Salem Allouzi · Khaled Mohammad Alomari · Nawal Louzi · Safwan Maghaydah
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.983704+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.983704+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Abu Dhabi University · Al-Ahliyya Amman University
Reported affiliation countries
AE · JO
Documentary abstract — original language
This study examines whether contemporary legal systems meaningfully recognize avatars in virtual environments as legally relevant extensions of their users. As immersive platforms increasingly shape social, economic, and professional interactions, avatars raise complex regulatory questions concerning identity, accountability, and data protection. Using a rubric-based comparative legal analysis across eleven jurisdictions, including the European Union, United States, China, India, and the United Arab Emirates, the study evaluates how existing privacy and data protection frameworks address avatar-related practices. The findings indicate that, despite the strength of modern data protection regimes, explicit legal recognition of avatars remains largely absent across the examined jurisdictions. This absence creates regulatory gaps in governing avatar identity, immersive consent, and accountability within immersive digital environments, and the study proposes targeted legislative reform directions based on the comparative findings.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7170514365
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103314
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- CN · IN · US
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w2053154970 · CITES
- openalex:w2164777277 · CITES
- Of, for, and by the people: the legal lacuna of synthetic persons · CITES
- openalex:w2767921955 · CITES
- openalex:w2894630186 · CITES
- openalex:w2972463624 · CITES
- openalex:w2989050900 · CITES
- openalex:w3000750784 · CITES
- openalex:w3104395947 · CITES
- openalex:w3118385276 · CITES
- openalex:w3123067247 · CITES
- openalex:w3157404034 · CITES
- openalex:w3184016654 · CITES
- openalex:w3186910995 · CITES
- openalex:w3196486048 · CITES
- openalex:w4210800068 · CITES
- Avatars in the metaverse: potential legal issues and remedies · CITES
- openalex:w4282827913 · CITES
- openalex:w4294214983 · CITES
- openalex:w4295887006 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Adel Salem Allouzi; Khaled Mohammad Alomari; Nawal Louzi; Safwan Maghaydah. A comparative legal analysis of avatar identity and regulatory gaps in virtual reality environments. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103314
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Adel Salem Allouzi; Khaled Mohammad Alomari; Nawal Louzi; Safwan Maghaydah. (2026). A comparative legal analysis of avatar identity and regulatory gaps in virtual reality environments. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103314
- Chicago
- Adel Salem Allouzi; Khaled Mohammad Alomari; Nawal Louzi; Safwan Maghaydah. A comparative legal analysis of avatar identity and regulatory gaps in virtual reality environments. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103314
- ISO 690
- Adel Salem Allouzi; Khaled Mohammad Alomari; Nawal Louzi; Safwan Maghaydah. A comparative legal analysis of avatar identity and regulatory gaps in virtual reality environments. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103314
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. A comparative legal analysis of avatar identity and regulatory gaps in virtual reality environments. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-a35c17f25cfe1510e2f96b00a5c5eed3/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 4a837d54c21d77d0 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.983704+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.983704+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.983704+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.983704+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.983704+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
48d248bfd310fdb0 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.983704+00:00
4acb868ea46083c8 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.983704+00:00
7675aed1186aac55 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.983704+00:00
4a837d54c21d77d0 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.983704+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103314
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7170514365
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.