The Buen Vivir and the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines in Ecuador: A Comparison
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_33
- Authors
- María José
- Reported year
- 2017
- Reported language
- en · und
- Source type
- Part of book or chapter of book
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.590909+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:07:01.642338+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research
Reported affiliation countries
DE
Documentary abstract — original language
The Buen Vivir paradigm, that inspired the Ecuadorian National Development Plan (PNBV) represents a shift in understanding development and articulates mother earth’s and human’s rights, both as subjects of legal protection. This chapter aims to disentangle contradictions between the PNBV and current practices at the small-scale fisheries sector. Theoretically grounded in the governability concept, we explore commonalities between the Buen Vivir objectives and the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries (SSF Guidelines) principles. The chapter (a) illustrates how are the PNBV objectives align to the guiding principles of the SSF Guidelines; (b) explores to what extent the actions taken by the state address issues desired to achieve small-scale fisheries sustainability; and (c) identifies what elements within the Ecuadorian fishing governance system are missing in order to enhance small-scale fisheries sustainability. The study involved a comprehensive literature review and empirical work using semi-structured interviews and participant observation. Commonalities on both instruments (e.g. diversity, sustainability, and human dignity) were found but also some unique elements such as in the PNBV (e.g. rights of nature and sovereignty) or in the SSF Guidelines (e.g. gender). Additionally, initiatives addressing some threats to the fisheries occur, but still are isolated practices with low connectivity to the entire fisheries systems. Finally, mismatches between the PNBV’s rhetoric and the fisheries governance practices occur and have inordinately delayed the improvement of small-scale fisheries governability. Coherent theories and practices at the political and social realms, under innovative ontological and epistemological connotations of fisheries will help to achieve their sustainability under the Buen Vivir paradigm.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2621656359
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_33
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::1218a25ca8313af71ddbfb6b58286151
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Book chapter
- Source-reported types
- Part of book or chapter of book · book-chapter
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- EC
- Natural entities mentioned
- Mother Earth
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Book bibliographic description
Access status unknown
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1133991730 · CITES
- ACOSTA, A. e MARTÍNEZ, E. (org.). El buen vivir: una via para el desarrollo. Quito. Abya-yala, 2009. · CITES
- openalex:w1490563478 · CITES
- Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects · CITES
- Ética animal en diálogo con recientes reformas en la legislación de países latinoamericanos · CITES
- openalex:w1541130347 · CITES
- openalex:w1542356730 · CITES
- openalex:w1557001362 · CITES
- El Buen Vivir, una oportunidad por construir · CITES
- openalex:w1770461300 · CITES
- openalex:w1859306660 · CITES
- openalex:w1919098807 · CITES
- openalex:w1919307643 · CITES
- openalex:w2012078356 · CITES
- openalex:w2022224805 · CITES
- openalex:w2025531751 · CITES
- openalex:w2049925729 · CITES
- openalex:w20505547 · CITES
- openalex:w2068937123 · CITES
- openalex:w2122802487 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
María José. The Buen Vivir and the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines in Ecuador: A Comparison. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_33
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- María José. (2017). The Buen Vivir and the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines in Ecuador: A Comparison. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_33
- Chicago
- María José. The Buen Vivir and the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines in Ecuador: A Comparison. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_33
- ISO 690
- María José. The Buen Vivir and the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines in Ecuador: A Comparison. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_33
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. The Buen Vivir and the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines in Ecuador: A Comparison. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-9fa841c9ca5b85415cd13f4305c2cd2c/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 2a9e8cd782bc1226 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.642338+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:49.202882+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.642338+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:49.202882+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.642338+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:49.202882+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.642338+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:49.202882+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.642338+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:49.202882+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
63c5c3e26082bd98 · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.642338+00:00
bf8b9b88a9a38687 · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.642338+00:00
ffad3033de56caba · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.642338+00:00
2a9e8cd782bc1226 · 2026-11-09T19:07:01.642338+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
EC ·
Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55074-9_33
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2621656359
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.