Due Diligence Legislation and the Politics of Implementation: The Case of the German Supply Chain Law
Identification
- Public canonical key
- radar:r-9d392fbf76b070c2ab12667afffab75e
- Authors
- Christian Scheper
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-13T14:53:55.101020+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-13T14:53:55.101020+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of Duisburg-Essen
Reported affiliation countries
DE
Documentary abstract — original language
ABSTRACT The article examines the implementation of mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence regulations as a politically formative process. Integrating insights from global value chain (GVC) research with the assumptions of legal struggles and legal endogeneity, the article analyses how administrative practice shapes the meaning and boundaries of due diligence obligations. The study empirically focuses on the German supply chain due diligence law, conducting a discourse analysis of eight guidance documents issued by the Federal Office of Economic Affairs and Export Control (BAFA). The German law is an insightful case study because the administrative body plays a more central role in the implementation process than in other due diligence laws. It acts as a key interpreter and guide for companies, as well as a controlling authority and handler of complaints. The analysis shows that BAFA's guidance must be understood in the context of an exceptionally high level of ambiguity that has arisen from the evolution of international soft law on due diligence norms. During implementation, the BAFA organizes ambiguity rather than resolving it, delegating substantive interpretive work to companies while normalizing private governance instruments such as audits and certifications. In doing so, administrative practice embeds due diligence obligations within existing GVC governance regimes and contributes to the hybridization and managerialization of public regulation. The article thus specifies how implementation becomes a key arena in which due diligence is shaped, contested, and potentially diluted.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- https://openalex.org/W7135037274
- DOI
- 10.1111/rego.70134
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- article
- Source-reported types
- article
- Publishers
- Wiley
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1
Cite this reference
Christian Scheper. Due Diligence Legislation and the Politics of Implementation: The Case of the German Supply Chain Law. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70134
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Christian Scheper. (2026). Due Diligence Legislation and the Politics of Implementation: The Case of the German Supply Chain Law. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70134
- Chicago
- Christian Scheper. Due Diligence Legislation and the Politics of Implementation: The Case of the German Supply Chain Law. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70134
- ISO 690
- Christian Scheper. Due Diligence Legislation and the Politics of Implementation: The Case of the German Supply Chain Law. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70134
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Due Diligence Legislation and the Politics of Implementation: The Case of the German Supply Chain Law. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-9d392fbf76b070c2ab12667afffab75e/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70134
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.