Jurisprudential challenges to the protection of the natural environment
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.4324/9780203798911-7
- Authors
- Doug
- Reported year
- 2014
- Reported language
- en · eng
- Source type
- Part of book or chapter of book
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:11:08.573314+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:13:40.757000+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
Ethical approaches issues underlie the ongoing discourse about the jurisprudential foundations of environmental law. An eccentric approach to environmental law is premised upon a need to respect and protect the values of nature for their own sake. It approaches to environmental law has been supported by arguments focused on: interdependence; spiritual harmony; extensions; and fictionist. A different environmental law is biocentrism, which effectively focuses on all living organisms. The need for ecological integrity reflects the concern for the non-human natural world the concept of inter-species justice. Ecological justice thus comprises intergenerational, intergenerational, and inter-species justice, supported by this duty to pass on the integrity of the planetary system. While humans can identify their own values, the values of non-human living organisms can be identified teleological: Our conceiving of each organism as a teleological centre of life is our recognition of the reality of its existence as a unique individual, pursuing its own good in its own way.
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.4324/9780203798911-7
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::04d4b7d9b058ad55f04a07c618957081
- OPENALEX
- W196161757
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Book chapter
- Source-reported types
- Part of book or chapter of book · book-chapter
- Natural entities mentioned
- Species
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Book bibliographic description
Access status unknown
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- Environmental Law and Ethics · CITES
4 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Doug. Jurisprudential challenges to the protection of the natural environment. 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798911-7
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Doug. (2014). Jurisprudential challenges to the protection of the natural environment. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798911-7
- Chicago
- Doug. Jurisprudential challenges to the protection of the natural environment. 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798911-7
- ISO 690
- Doug. Jurisprudential challenges to the protection of the natural environment. 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798911-7
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Jurisprudential challenges to the protection of the natural environment. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-85589fc3b3e1781900da9ecfb76bd5d0/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version df1b6b584aecc9fc · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.573314+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:40.757000+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.573314+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:40.757000+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.573314+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:40.757000+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.573314+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:40.757000+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.573314+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:40.757000+00:00 - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:13:40.757000+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
2d1496a3e2b95dff · 2026-11-09T19:13:40.757000+00:00
33c18af784cdd64f · 2026-11-09T19:13:40.757000+00:00
7b3a6b17d9c82496 · 2026-11-09T19:13:40.757000+00:00
df1b6b584aecc9fc · 2026-11-09T19:13:40.757000+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798911-7
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W196161757
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.