Pictorial sign and social order : L'Académie Royale de Peinture et Sculpture 1638-1752
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.82444/warw.33599002
- Authors
- Nicholas Mirzoeff
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- dissertation
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
In my doctorate, I have sought to question the establishment of the Academy in France along two particular lines of enquiry. I considered why the government established a state institution for the arts and how and why it sought to influence artistic production. Under Richelieu, artistic initiatives were subordinated to the requirements of factional court politics. But after the upheavals of the Fronde (1648-53), the monarchy created the Absolutist court in which aesthetics were politics. In the phrase used by the logicians of Port-Royal: Le portrait du Cesar, c'est Cesar". The increased political importance of the image coincided with a radical re-evaluation of sight and its representation in the visual image, following the work of Descartes. I therefore set out to analyse the debates in and around the Academy concerning theories of vision and their implication for the artist. I found the Academy resisted Cartesian and perspectival theory and expelled its first Professor of Perspective, Abraham Bosse, in a dispute which sheds much light on its institutional and theoretical base. Far from being an easy Academic victory, the dispute required the intervention of Colbert himself. Insteadof the Desarguian perspective championed by Bosse, the Academy's theorist, Gregoire Huret sought to control the pictorial sign through gender difference. But his theory contained too many prohibitions to be of practical use to artists. It was not until the Academy was pushed by the government into accepting the Modern theories of Roger de Piles that a gap opened between nature and its representation in which artists could operate. These two histories were closely linked, for it was not until the Academy found a means of representing its theory in the work of Watteau and the fête galante artists, that it achieved institutional security. The final chapter of my thesis analyses Watteau's work as a resolution of the long-standing theoretical uncertainty in the Academy over the status of the visual image. In an epilogue, the rapid death of the fete galante as a genre is shown to mark the end of this chapter of Academic history. In elucidating the often complex artistic theories in early modern France, I have made use of the methodology and theory of contemporary French thinkers such as Louis Mann, Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida. Their insights have helped me appreciate the complexity and vitality of Academic thought which has so often been readily dismissed as sterile scholasticism. The painters of the Academy were also theorists. In that sense, we have much to learn from them.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W1485944690
- DOI
- 10.82444/warw.33599002
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Thesis
- Source-reported types
- dissertation
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.82444/warw.33599002
- Document · http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/35527/1/WRAP_THESIS_Mirzoeff_1990.pdf
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W1485944690
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Nicholas Mirzoeff. Pictorial sign and social order : L'Académie Royale de Peinture et Sculpture 1638-1752. 2026. https://doi.org/10.82444/warw.33599002
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Nicholas Mirzoeff. (2026). Pictorial sign and social order : L'Académie Royale de Peinture et Sculpture 1638-1752. https://doi.org/10.82444/warw.33599002
- Chicago
- Nicholas Mirzoeff. Pictorial sign and social order : L'Académie Royale de Peinture et Sculpture 1638-1752. 2026. https://doi.org/10.82444/warw.33599002
- ISO 690
- Nicholas Mirzoeff. Pictorial sign and social order : L'Académie Royale de Peinture et Sculpture 1638-1752. 2026. https://doi.org/10.82444/warw.33599002
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Pictorial sign and social order : L'Académie Royale de Peinture et Sculpture 1638-1752. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-7f7fdb28e37c2128f6b254eb963cb362/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 0d09476e3daa0bc0 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
95ec7f6ad60ad4f2 · 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
6e58588f1790d367 · 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
2dc99b88933e03d6 · 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
0d09476e3daa0bc0 · 2026-11-09T19:18:23.278923+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.82444/warw.33599002
Discovery source · http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/35527/1/WRAP_THESIS_Mirzoeff_1990.pdf
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W1485944690
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.