Legal And Ethical Challenges Of AI Based Diagnostics In India
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.60926
- Authors
- B VARSHINI · Satya Sanjana G.R
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.762629+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.762629+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
The rapid development and use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the diagnostic processes in India signify advancements in healthcare efficacy, efficiency, and accessibility. However, this is overshadowed by the legal and ethical ambiguities regarding liability and accountability when diagnostic errors occur. This research paper investigates the challenge of assigning responsibility within the multi-stakeholder ecosystem of AI-based diagnostics. Developers, healthcare providers, regulators, data fiduciaries and patients are just few of the parties involved. Traditionally, the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, places liability on the healthcare providers and institutions for medical negligence, but if AI makes a wrong diagnosis, who is liable? The doctor, the AI developer, or the hospital? Through a review of existing legal frameworks this research paper highlights the lack of specific regulatory frameworks and suggests solutions to bridge the gap. Current laws are incapable of accurately assigning responsibility when developers, data fiduciaries, clinicians, and AI algorithms collectively contribute to a diagnostic outcome.This paper provides an analysis of current and emerging cyber laws and proposes an adaptive legal framework that combines patient data protection with AI diagnostic liability, clearly outlining the roles and responsibilities of all the parties involved, while taking into account the opacity of AI systems.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4416409814
- DOI
- 10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.60926
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- IN
- Natural entities mentioned
- Ecosystem
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
B VARSHINI; Satya Sanjana G.R. Legal And Ethical Challenges Of AI Based Diagnostics In India. 2025. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.60926
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- B VARSHINI; Satya Sanjana G.R. (2025). Legal And Ethical Challenges Of AI Based Diagnostics In India. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.60926
- Chicago
- B VARSHINI; Satya Sanjana G.R. Legal And Ethical Challenges Of AI Based Diagnostics In India. 2025. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.60926
- ISO 690
- B VARSHINI; Satya Sanjana G.R. Legal And Ethical Challenges Of AI Based Diagnostics In India. 2025. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.60926
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Legal And Ethical Challenges Of AI Based Diagnostics In India. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-78639c0bc391fd4bdfd5d7d49ad454db/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version b6d17daf8f841b42 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.762629+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.762629+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.762629+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.762629+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.762629+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
765ea54bc8e3b9a0 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.762629+00:00
87e7b555fe27c71a · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.762629+00:00
2b36c80d749e0a55 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.762629+00:00
b6d17daf8f841b42 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.762629+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
IN ·
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.60926
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4416409814
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.