UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Primera regla vinculante establecida en la ejecutoria Nº 3671-2014-Lima y la contravención con lo señalado por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en el fundamento 219 de la sentencia del caso TIBI vs. Ecuador.

Identification

Public canonical key

openalex:w3086539415

Authors

Luis Gustavo Castillo Aubert · Yessica Incarroca Veredas

Reported year

2016

Reported language

es

Source type

dissertation

First detected

2026-11-09T19:14:49.900490+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:14:49.900490+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

This thesis deals with the development of doctrine, legislative and jurisprudential level, around the consequences and legal relevance of the third party property, specifically refers to the existence of a conflict of rights of a different nature from an embargo registered (credit) and the property is not registered, the problem raised in the seventh Plenum Civil Casatorio constitutes a legal precedent in which binding rules that relate directly to the courts of the country are issued; in this context we have as a reference point the second paragraph of the Civil Code, in which the problem stated above and whose varied interpretation generated antagonistic to the level of the Supreme Court \npronouncements article presents 2022; what was intended with the Seventh Plenum Civil Casatorio was to unify criteria on the correct interpretation of Article pre quoted ending the legal uncertainty in addition to providing predictability in subsequent resolutions; Thus the aim of this thesis is to analyze the various discordant executory that led to the issuance of a plenary casatorio also make an analysis of the fundamentals of the court with the presentation of amicus curiae finally establishing whether binding rules issued in the seventh Plenum Civil Casatorio fit our current sociocultural context respecting international rules; We found so that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Case of Tibi vs. Ecuador in reference to the conflict of rights between a tercerista whose right to property is not registered and enrolled embargo represents the right credit solved this conflict of rights different nature establishing the foundation 219 that "this record is necessary for the sole purpose of the enforceability on the claim of a third party is to have any right over the good." Aspects that develop throughout our thesis in order to establish our position.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W3086539415

Documentary context

Documentary family

Thesis

Source-reported types

dissertation

Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources

EC

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• Document · http://repositorio.uandina.edu.pe/handle/UAC/480
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W3086539415

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.