Social Sciences in One Health: Insights From Multiple Worlds Perspectives on the Dam Rupture in Brumadinho-Brazil
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.649355
- Authors
- Ana Pérola Drulla Brandão · Stefanie Sussai · Jéssica Alves de Lima Germine · Diego Duarte Eltz · Aline Lütz de Araújo
- Reported year
- 2021
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Universidade Federal do ABC · Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · Universidade de São Paulo · Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
Documentary abstract — original language
Concepts that integrate human, animal, and ecosystem health - such as One Health (OH) - have been highlighted in recent years and mobilized in transdisciplinary approaches. However, there is a lack of input from the social sciences in OH discussions. This is a gap to overcome, including in Latin America. Therefore, this paper incorporates recent studies from economics and anthropology to the debate, contributing to the opening of transdisciplinary dialogues for the elaboration of OH theory and practice. As a starting point, we explore the recent case of a tailings dam breach, making considerations about how and why this event was experienced in different ways by the affected Indigenous and non-Indigenous worlds. From economics, we show how different theories perceive and impact these different worlds, presenting some existing alternatives to the hegemonic thinking of domination and exploitation. From anthropology, we present the perspectivism concept, deriving from the field of relational ontologies, suggesting there are significant and inevitable disagreements-equivocations-among different worlds. Thus, we discuss how the social sciences can help address challenging factors that need to be considered in health approaches that intend to deal with complex global problems. In conclusion, OH should incorporate social science discussions, considering relating practice to the multiple realities in which a particular problem or conflict is inserted. Overcoming the barriers that hinder transdisciplinary dialogue is fundamental and urgent for an effective approach to the multiple and distinct interconnections among humans, animals and environments.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W3204193771
- DOI
- 10.3389/fpubh.2021.649355
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- BR
- Natural entities mentioned
- Ecosystem
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1817336740 · CITES
- openalex:w1965673962 · CITES
- openalex:w1967277127 · CITES
- openalex:w1990571787 · CITES
- openalex:w1999256245 · CITES
- openalex:w2001327009 · CITES
- openalex:w2011857189 · CITES
- openalex:w2029810178 · CITES
- openalex:w2036479846 · CITES
- openalex:w2046732721 · CITES
- openalex:w2053784172 · CITES
- openalex:w2058817183 · CITES
- openalex:w2078817225 · CITES
- openalex:w2096939475 · CITES
- openalex:w2125694759 · CITES
- openalex:w2169697775 · CITES
- openalex:w2175751433 · CITES
- openalex:w2187841913 · CITES
- openalex:w2269494965 · CITES
- openalex:w2519570619 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Ana Pérola Drulla Brandão; Stefanie Sussai; Jéssica Alves de Lima Germine; Diego Duarte Eltz; Aline Lütz de Araújo. Social Sciences in One Health: Insights From Multiple Worlds Perspectives on the Dam Rupture in Brumadinho-Brazil. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.649355
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Ana Pérola Drulla Brandão; Stefanie Sussai; Jéssica Alves de Lima Germine; Diego Duarte Eltz; Aline Lütz de Araújo. (2021). Social Sciences in One Health: Insights From Multiple Worlds Perspectives on the Dam Rupture in Brumadinho-Brazil. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.649355
- Chicago
- Ana Pérola Drulla Brandão; Stefanie Sussai; Jéssica Alves de Lima Germine; Diego Duarte Eltz; Aline Lütz de Araújo. Social Sciences in One Health: Insights From Multiple Worlds Perspectives on the Dam Rupture in Brumadinho-Brazil. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.649355
- ISO 690
- Ana Pérola Drulla Brandão; Stefanie Sussai; Jéssica Alves de Lima Germine; Diego Duarte Eltz; Aline Lütz de Araújo. Social Sciences in One Health: Insights From Multiple Worlds Perspectives on the Dam Rupture in Brumadinho-Brazil. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.649355
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Social Sciences in One Health: Insights From Multiple Worlds Perspectives on the Dam Rupture in Brumadinho-Brazil. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-6e7cd91c4aca55675bb2e8e6ca74b12f/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 23ee5c502342afa1 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
525a4d6544eade33 · 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
6aa2a2a6aba32743 · 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
ecda61f7a0eb4d7d · 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
23ee5c502342afa1 · 2026-11-09T19:12:42.767747+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
BR ·
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.649355
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W3204193771
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.