UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Biosentrisme dan Ekosentrisme: Alternatif Pandangan Filsafat Lingkungan terhadap Krisis Alam di Era Antroposentrisme

Identification

Public canonical key

doi:10.23887/jfi.v8i2.88217

Authors

Bagus Budi Priyono · Suhadi Purwantara · Widyastuti Widyastuti

Reported year

2025

Reported language

en

Source type

article

First detected

2026-11-09T19:13:40.750835+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:13:40.750835+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Yogyakarta State University

Documentary abstract — original language

Global environmental crises, such as global warming, ecosystem degradation, and biodiversity loss, demonstrate the limitations of the anthropocentric approach that focuses on human interests in managing nature. As an alternative, biocentrism and ecocentrism offer a more inclusive view by emphasizing the intrinsic value of living things and the importance of maintaining the integrity of the ecosystem as a whole. This article uses a literature review method to explore the basic principles, differences, and relevance of these two approaches in dealing with the environmental crisis in the era of anthropocentrism. Through the identification, analysis, and synthesis of various current literatures, this article is expected to provide insight into how biocentrism and ecocentrism can contribute to more sustainable environmental policy updates. The results show that the implementation of biocentrism and ecocentrism views has been carried out in various countries. Indonesia, Bhutan, Costa Rica, and Nepal are some examples of countries that apply the biocentric view in formulating some of their policies. Ecuador, Australia, South Africa, and India are examples of countries that apply the ecocentric view in formulating some of their policies. This implementation replaces the anthropocentric view that has dominated environmental policy for centuries. This policy certainly supports the preservation, protection, and balance of the ecosystem.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W4412745639

DOI

10.23887/jfi.v8i2.88217

Documentary context

Documentary family

Scholarship

Source-reported types

article

Natural entities mentioned

Ecosystem

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v8i2.88217
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4412745639

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

• openalex:w1568051873 · CITES
• openalex:w1971030867 · CITES
• Rights of Pachamama: The emergence of an earth jurisprudence in the Americas · CITES
• openalex:w2545197130 · CITES
• Why ecocentrism is the key pathway to sustainability · CITES
• Anthropocentrism: More than Just a Misunderstood Problem · CITES
• openalex:w2908779736 · CITES
• openalex:w2982193995 · CITES
• openalex:w2992928513 · CITES
• openalex:w3126515656 · CITES
• Challenges for the Implementation of the Rights of Nature: Ecuador and Bolivia as the First Instances of an Expanding Movement · CITES
• openalex:w3198640674 · CITES
• openalex:w3207448887 · CITES
• openalex:w4281970154 · CITES
• openalex:w4282837216 · CITES
• MENILAI DAMPAK ETIKA LINGKUNGAN TERHADAP KERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN: SEBUAH PERTIMBANGAN MELAMPAUI MORALISME · CITES
• openalex:w4286251114 · CITES
• openalex:w4294233372 · CITES
• openalex:w4297360821 · CITES
• openalex:w4298013032 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.