Addressing the Great Salt Lake Desiccation: Exploring Support for Alternative Frameworks on Rights of Nature and Multispecies Justice
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.26076/58f0-0976
- Authors
- Sadie Braddock
- Reported year
- 2024
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.972134+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-10T16:58:51.470579+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
Currently, there is a lack of social science research on the Great Salt Lake – a shrinking lake that faces potential ecological collapse as more water is taken upstream for human uses before it can get to the lake. The drying lake has received national attention, as it will lead to a loss of wildlife habitat, contribute to public health concerns, and impact Utah’s economy. In response to this issue, environmental scientists and activists have pressured policymakers to prioritize actions to conserve water for the lake. However, while polices have been implemented, water saved from these efforts are not guaranteed to make it to the lake. Further, lake advocates stress that such efforts are not enough to meet the urgency of this issue. Therefore, this study explores Utahns’ support for alternative solutions to address the drying of the Great Salt Lake such as rights of nature and multispecies justice approaches. Rights of nature is an earth-based social movement and legal strategy recognizing nature as an entity deserving of rights, while multispecies justice is a holistic framework examining how harmful structures in society contribute impact humans, animals, and all other types of species. If applied to the Great Salt Lake, these approaches could pave the way to grant the lake its own water rights to ensure water does get to the like while also taking into consideration what is helpful for humans and all other species that depend on the lake. Using logistic regression analysis, this study utilizes data from a statewide survey conducted by researchers at Utah State University called the Utah People and Environment Poll, which was designed to track Utahns’ views on environmental issues of importance in the state. Key findings include that nearly 29% of Utahns strongly support a rights of nature approach and over 37% strongly support a multispecies justice approach as solutions to save the Great Salt Lake. These results will help inform Utah policymakers, stakeholders, nonprofit and other advocacy groups to foster collaborative strategies best for promoting a viable and just management of the Great Salt Lake.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W6945790746
- DOI
- 10.26076/58f0-0976
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::eafc7215a20d32ee99177f8ffb3f4146
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Other literature type · Text · article
- Natural entities mentioned
- Lake · Species
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
DataCite · Record 1
OpenAIRE · Record 1 · Record 2
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.26076/58f0-0976
- Document · https://dx.doi.org/10.26076/58f0-0976
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W6945790746
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
1 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Sadie Braddock. Addressing the Great Salt Lake Desiccation: Exploring Support for Alternative Frameworks on Rights of Nature and Multispecies Justice. 2024. https://doi.org/10.26076/58f0-0976
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Sadie Braddock. (2024). Addressing the Great Salt Lake Desiccation: Exploring Support for Alternative Frameworks on Rights of Nature and Multispecies Justice. https://doi.org/10.26076/58f0-0976
- Chicago
- Sadie Braddock. Addressing the Great Salt Lake Desiccation: Exploring Support for Alternative Frameworks on Rights of Nature and Multispecies Justice. 2024. https://doi.org/10.26076/58f0-0976
- ISO 690
- Sadie Braddock. Addressing the Great Salt Lake Desiccation: Exploring Support for Alternative Frameworks on Rights of Nature and Multispecies Justice. 2024. https://doi.org/10.26076/58f0-0976
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Addressing the Great Salt Lake Desiccation: Exploring Support for Alternative Frameworks on Rights of Nature and Multispecies Justice. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5f2a58aa4771f3b2e04fdedc79e7c1d3/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 5d66b5ce536ceca4 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- DataCite · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402224+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:36.695302+00:00 - Authors
- DataCite · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402224+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:36.695302+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- DataCite · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402224+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:36.695302+00:00 - Identifiers
- DataCite · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402224+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:36.695302+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:36.695302+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.972134+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
1c4d2a6134f6a69e · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402224+00:00
7debc4585d979bf9 · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402224+00:00
dfec8db4c3a86b90 · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402224+00:00
a62f2fabb34e5290 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.470579+00:00
5d66b5ce536ceca4 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.470579+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.26076/58f0-0976
Discovery source · https://dx.doi.org/10.26076/58f0-0976
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W6945790746
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.