UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

A Comparative Study of Methods for Inferring the Objectives of Marriage in Imami Jurisprudence and Iraqi Positive Law

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.61838/jhrlp.195
Authors
Afnan Mazhar Farhoud Al-Janabi · Mohammad Aminfard · Ahmad Mortazi
Reported year
2025
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-09T19:04:47.712571+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:04:47.712571+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

University of Tabriz

Reported affiliation countries

IR

Documentary abstract — original language

Marriage in Imami jurisprudence and the Islamic legal system of Iraq, as one of the most important social and religious institutions, has a profound impact on individual and social relationships. The objectives of Sharia (maqāṣid al-sharīʿa), as the general purposes of Islam, play a fundamental role in determining the legal rulings of marriage. While these objectives emphasize the preservation of lineage, the provision of tranquility, and the establishment of a healthy relationship between spouses, adapting them to contemporary social and legal transformations—particularly in Iraqi society—has generated numerous challenges. Accordingly, the present study examines the influence of the objectives of Sharia on the formulation of marriage rulings and their implications for family law in Iraq. The aim of this study is to investigate how the objectives of Sharia affect the legal rulings of marriage in Imami jurisprudence and Iraqi family law. In addition, the study analyzes the existing challenges and potential solutions for aligning these objectives with contemporary legal and social developments. This research employs an analytical–comparative methodology. To analyze the impact of the objectives of Sharia on marriage rulings in Iraq, jurisprudential, legal, and sociological sources have been utilized. Furthermore, a comparative analysis is conducted between the objectives of Sharia and Iraqi statutory law concerning family-related issues such as divorce, dowry (mahr), alimony (nafaqah), and polygyny. The findings indicate that the objectives of Sharia—particularly the preservation of lineage and the provision of psychological tranquility for spouses—are of paramount importance in determining marriage rulings. Nevertheless, significant challenges remain in reconciling these objectives with contemporary social and economic changes. Especially in matters concerning women’s rights, divorce, and polygyny, there is a pressing need for legal revision and harmonization with the individual and social requirements of modern society. Aligning the objectives of Sharia with emerging social and cultural needs necessitates both legal and jurisprudential reforms. Such reforms must simultaneously preserve religious principles and respond effectively to the individual and societal needs of Iraq and other Islamic countries.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W7166311602
DOI
10.61838/jhrlp.195

Documentary context

Documentary family
Scholarship
Source-reported types
article

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Not recorded
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Afnan Mazhar Farhoud Al-Janabi; Mohammad Aminfard; Ahmad Mortazi. A Comparative Study of Methods for Inferring the Objectives of Marriage in Imami Jurisprudence and Iraqi Positive Law. 2025. https://doi.org/10.61838/jhrlp.195

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Afnan Mazhar Farhoud Al-Janabi; Mohammad Aminfard; Ahmad Mortazi. (2025). A Comparative Study of Methods for Inferring the Objectives of Marriage in Imami Jurisprudence and Iraqi Positive Law. https://doi.org/10.61838/jhrlp.195
Chicago
Afnan Mazhar Farhoud Al-Janabi; Mohammad Aminfard; Ahmad Mortazi. A Comparative Study of Methods for Inferring the Objectives of Marriage in Imami Jurisprudence and Iraqi Positive Law. 2025. https://doi.org/10.61838/jhrlp.195
ISO 690
Afnan Mazhar Farhoud Al-Janabi; Mohammad Aminfard; Ahmad Mortazi. A Comparative Study of Methods for Inferring the Objectives of Marriage in Imami Jurisprudence and Iraqi Positive Law. 2025. https://doi.org/10.61838/jhrlp.195

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. A Comparative Study of Methods for Inferring the Objectives of Marriage in Imami Jurisprudence and Iraqi Positive Law. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5e2ffaaaef00ae0d228a4ba0a2e67dc9/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version 83b99c41b861c8b2 · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.712571+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.712571+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.712571+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.712571+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.712571+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

4846d31e5bd7743e · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.712571+00:00

d40418b1c9f681aa · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.712571+00:00

bea402e6328c7cf3 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.712571+00:00

83b99c41b861c8b2 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.712571+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

University of Tabriz

Afnan Mazhar Farhoud Al-Janabi

Ahmad Mortazi

Mohammad Aminfard

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.61838/jhrlp.195

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7166311602

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library