UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Agoa's Expiry As A Neo-Colonial Rupture: Tariffs, Critical Minerals And The Right To Development Sovereignty In Africa

Identification

Public canonical key

doi:10.2139/ssrn.6502158

Authors

Siyabonga Hadebe

Reported year

2026

Reported language

en

Source type

preprint

First detected

2026-11-09T19:15:44.545820+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:15:44.545820+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Maastricht University

Documentary abstract — original language

The expiry of the non-reciprocal African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) on 30 September 2025 marked the end of 25 years of preferential trade relations between the United States (US) and Africa. This paper contends that AGOA institutionalised a neocolonial dependency by using conditional market access in ways that subordinated African development priorities to US political and security interests. Although its lapse, combined with the unilateral imposition of reciprocal US tariffs, caused a significant economic rupture, it did not translate into African economic sovereignty. Instead, it exposed Africa's deep entanglement within an international economic system governed by multilateral trade rules, sovereign debt discipline, investment arbitration and private capital. The subsequent political effort to restore AGOA reflects a broader shift towards a securitised and transactional US trade policy in which market access is used as a bargaining tool for securing strategic minerals and advancing geopolitical objectives. Within this context, this analysis engages the 'dilemma of Pan-Africanism': the tension between immediate national priorities and long-term continental agency. Past failures are treated not as grounds for retreat, but as a basis for strategic caution. Against this backdrop, the paper presents a deliberately limited and conditional argument that Africa's bargaining power lies in its endowment of critical minerals. However, translating this advantage into developmental gains requires disciplined continental coordination and robust legal frameworks. Accordingly, the paper proposes a three-pillar strategy grounded in the Right to Development: (1) reciprocal mineral-technology arrangements; (2) operationalising the African Green Minerals Strategy; and (3) the expansion of regional value chains under the African Continental Free Trade Area.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W7147711642

DOI

10.2139/ssrn.6502158

Documentary context

Documentary family

Working paper

Source-reported types

preprint

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6502158
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7147711642

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

• openalex:w7117139998 · CITES

0 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.