Representations of Nature Mediating Between Ecology and Science Policy: The Case of the International Biological Programme
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1177/030631287017003002
- Authors
- Chunglin Kwa
- Reported year
- 1987
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:08:22.440357+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:10:24.432581+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of Amsterdam
Documentary abstract — original language
This paper considers some aspects of the early history of the American contribution to the International Biological Programme (IBP), ecology's only venture into `Big Science'. It is argued that American ecologists were successful in obtaining generous funding for the IBP from the US Congress, thanks to a shared understanding of the way in which controlling nature was to be accomplished, expressed in the metaphor of the `cybernetic machine'. To support this argument, a literary analysis is performed on Congressional documents, on scientific and popular books and papers by ecologists, and on writings of the environmental movement. The paper explores how a dominant representation of nature, or mentalité, is brought about, and its political effects.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W1972010871
- DOI
- 10.1177/030631287017003002
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::beef56cc77d0dbc597e97b3c680e07b0
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w2038216872 · CITES
- openalex:w2109028664 · CITES
- openalex:w2317845212 · CITES
- openalex:w3145345180 · CITES
4 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Chunglin Kwa. Representations of Nature Mediating Between Ecology and Science Policy: The Case of the International Biological Programme. 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631287017003002
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Chunglin Kwa. (1987). Representations of Nature Mediating Between Ecology and Science Policy: The Case of the International Biological Programme. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631287017003002
- Chicago
- Chunglin Kwa. Representations of Nature Mediating Between Ecology and Science Policy: The Case of the International Biological Programme. 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631287017003002
- ISO 690
- Chunglin Kwa. Representations of Nature Mediating Between Ecology and Science Policy: The Case of the International Biological Programme. 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631287017003002
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Representations of Nature Mediating Between Ecology and Science Policy: The Case of the International Biological Programme. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-5cb55dbf6bf144517c423b8622b00a49/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 55d18330d2ad933c · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:24.432581+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.440357+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:24.432581+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.440357+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:24.432581+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.440357+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:24.432581+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.440357+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:24.432581+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:22.440357+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
ee7b05ff2136d912 · 2026-11-09T19:10:24.432581+00:00
46a139d6be10ab56 · 2026-11-09T19:10:24.432581+00:00
bf9df18756638eda · 2026-11-09T19:10:24.432581+00:00
55d18330d2ad933c · 2026-11-09T19:10:24.432581+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1177/030631287017003002
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W1972010871
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.