Editorial
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i1a13
- Authors
- Christa Rautenbach
- Reported year
- 2015
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- editorial
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.973837+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:11:08.578047+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
North-West University
Reported affiliation countries
ZA
Documentary abstract — original language
The first edition of 2015 boasts 13 contributions dealing with a variety of topics. The first article, by Ben Coetzee Bester and Anne Louw, discusses the persistence of the "choice argument", which is based on the rationale that domestic partners who choose not to marry cannot claim spousal benefits, and arrives at the conclusion that legislation should differentiate between registered and unregistered domestic partnerships for the purpose of spousal benefits. Ernst Marais has written two articles on expropriation. In the first he examines the meaning and role of state acquisition in South African law and in the second he deals with the distinction between deprivation and expropriation in the light of Agri South Africa v Minister for Minerals and Energy 2013 4 SA 1 (CC), where the Constitutional Court recently revisited the distinction between the two concepts and held that the distinguishing feature of expropriation is that it entails state acquisition of property, whilst deprivation takes place where there is no such acquisition. The fourth article, by Emeka Amechi, explores the measures taken by the National Recordal System and Disclosure of Origins in leveraging traditional knowledge within the structure, content and conceptual framework of the patent system in South Africa. The South African Companies Act and the realization of corporate human rights responsibilities is the focus of Manson Gwanyanya's article. He comes to the conclusion that the wording of the Act is such that it prevent human rights abuses by companies. In her contribution Melanie Murcott discusses the development of the doctrine of legitimate expectations in South African law and the failure of the Constitutional Court to develop the doctrine even further in the recent case of Kwazulu-Natal Joint Liaison Committee v MEC for Education, Kwazulu Natal. The second last article, which is by Lucyline Murungi, considers the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006) to provide for inclusive basic education in South Africa, and the last article, which is by Matome Ratiba, examines the significance of places of worship for Native Americans and demonstrates the valuable lessons South Africa could learn from the earth jurisprudence that has developed in the USA and elsewhere. The first note, authored by Magdaleen Swanepoel, discusses legal issues with regard to mentally ill offenders with specific reference to the cases where mental illness is raised as a defence in criminal cases. The second note, by Michelle Fuchs, deals with recent legal developments relating to the formalities involved when a mortgagee wants to declare immovable property executable to satisfy outstanding debt. The last contribution in this edition is a case note by Elmarie Fourie. She considers the question of what constitutes a benefit in terms of section 186(2) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995, which was examined in Apollo Tyres South Africa (Pty)Ltd v CCMA 2013 5 BLLR 434 (LAC).
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4230149432
- DOI
- 10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i1a13
- OPENAIRE
- doi_________::3917e30f3a51648225a84962ca569c32
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Other
- Source-reported types
- Article · editorial
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- ZA
- Natural entities mentioned
- Lake
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Christa Rautenbach. Editorial. 2015. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i1a13
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Christa Rautenbach. (2015). Editorial. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i1a13
- Chicago
- Christa Rautenbach. Editorial. 2015. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i1a13
- ISO 690
- Christa Rautenbach. Editorial. 2015. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i1a13
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Editorial. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-57ef59292605cb9ca5ec2f2b33d124e3/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 126c648b6011a831 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.578047+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.522634+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.578047+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.522634+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.578047+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.522634+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.578047+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.522634+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.578047+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.522634+00:00 - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:10:43.522634+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
d8a10dcc4d5c9c96 · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.578047+00:00
b80239486a4912ba · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.578047+00:00
9ff68bbfb208b325 · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.578047+00:00
126c648b6011a831 · 2026-11-09T19:11:08.578047+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
ZA ·
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2015/v18i1a13
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4230149432
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.