The Jurisprudence of Thomas Berry
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1163/156853511x574478
- Authors
- Peter Burdon
- Reported year
- 2011
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.677772+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:04:57.538726+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
The University of Adelaide
Reported affiliation countries
AU
Documentary abstract — original language
Abstract On June 1 2009 Fr Thomas Berry passed away at his home in Greensboro N.C. In his final book before passing, Berry challenged human society to a carry out a transition from a period of human devastation of the Earth to a period when humans would be present to the planet in a mutually beneficial manner. This 'Great Work' encompassed religion, education, science and law. In this paper I will address Berry's argument that our current legal system supports the destruction of the environment and outline two ideas he put forward for evolving law. The first idea recognises that human law operates within and should be bound by the overarching laws of the natural world. From this perspective, the laws of nature are primary and human law would receive its legal quality and authority from its conformity with this law. The second proposal was to recognise that the earth consists of subjects, not objects and that all subjects are capable of holding rights. I will consider this argument in the context of two recent enactments of 'rights for nature' legislation in municipalities in the United States and in the constitution of Ecuador.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2056949674
- DOI
- 10.1163/156853511x574478
- HANDLE
- 2440/70529
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.1163/156853511x574478
- Handle · https://hdl.handle.net/2440/70529
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W2056949674
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
14 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Peter Burdon. The Jurisprudence of Thomas Berry. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853511x574478
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Peter Burdon. (2011). The Jurisprudence of Thomas Berry. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853511x574478
- Chicago
- Peter Burdon. The Jurisprudence of Thomas Berry. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853511x574478
- ISO 690
- Peter Burdon. The Jurisprudence of Thomas Berry. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853511x574478
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. The Jurisprudence of Thomas Berry. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-50f38efee30490c9a1e01b8f2e15f8d0/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 760f65ed49d0e36e · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:57.538726+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:57.538726+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:57.538726+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.677772+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:57.538726+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:57.538726+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:57.538726+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
bead18c98b237ecc · 2026-11-09T19:04:57.538726+00:00
95cc66487555457e · 2026-11-09T19:04:57.538726+00:00
a6f72f7916996b06 · 2026-11-09T19:04:57.538726+00:00
760f65ed49d0e36e · 2026-11-09T19:04:57.538726+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1163/156853511x574478
Discovery source · https://hdl.handle.net/2440/70529
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2056949674
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.