Direito Internacional do Ambiente e Direitos da Natureza : dos discursos antropocêntricos a uma abordagem biocêntrica
Identification
- Public canonical key
- openalex:w7027853529
- Authors
- Neves, Maria Inês Branquinho da Costa
- Reported year
- 2019
- Reported language
- pt
- Source type
- dissertation
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.645097+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-10T16:58:51.147916+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
Cientes dos grandes desafios que a situação ambiental global exige à humanidade, propusemo-nos, com a presente dissertação, a analisar duas abordagens de Direito à proteção ambiental. Uma - tradicional e dominante - antropocêntrica, e outra - recente e inovadora - biocêntrica, à qual dedicámos atenção central. Com o objetivo de demonstrar o maior nível de proteção ambiental que a proposta biocêntrica, especificamente os Direitos da Natureza, pode oferecer, procurámos, em primeiro lugar, compreende-la pela sua contraposição face a conceitos e influências com os quais inevitavelmente comunica. Com o estudo de casos, nomeadamente do Equador e da Bolívia, onde a proposta foi de forma pioneira abraçada, e de outros países, onde também se a abraçou, mas de forma menos integrada, ou, se quisermos, completa, indagámos algumas repercussões jurídicas de dita proposta. Finalizámos o estudo problematizando uma possível integração da abordagem biocêntrica à escala internacional. Porque para um maior aproveitamento das suas potencialidades face a uma crise que é global, torna-se imprescindível, concluímos, o debate a esta dimensão. Aware of the great challenges that the global environmental situation demands of humanity, we have proposed ourselves, with the present dissertation, to analyze two approaches of Law to environmental protection. One - traditional and dominant - anthropocentric, and another - recent and innovative - biocentric, to which we have give central attention. In order to demonstrate the highest level of environmental protection that the biocentric proposal, specifically the Rights of Nature, can offer, we first sought to understand it by its opposition to concepts and influences with which it inevitably communicates. With the cases study, namely from Ecuador and Bolivia, where the proposal was pioneered, and from other countries, where it was also embraced, but less integrated or, if we wish, complete, we inquired some legal repercussions of this proposal. Finally, we questioned a possible integration of the biocentric approach on an international scale. In order to take full advantage of its potential towards a global crisis, the debate on this scale is essential.
Identifiers
- OPENAIRE
- od______2020::7c19831483910734a74ff56c9d9e6cbc
- OPENALEX
- W7027853529
- HANDLE
- 10400.14/30395
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Thesis
- Source-reported types
- Master thesis · dissertation
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- BO · EC
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- Document · http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/30395
- Document · https://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/30395
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7027853529
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Not recorded
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Neves, Maria Inês Branquinho da Costa. Direito Internacional do Ambiente e Direitos da Natureza : dos discursos antropocêntricos a uma abordagem biocêntrica. 2019. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-4f2bfb1783ceb7eead5f3504db86c7eb/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Neves, Maria Inês Branquinho da Costa. (2019). Direito Internacional do Ambiente e Direitos da Natureza : dos discursos antropocêntricos a uma abordagem biocêntrica. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-4f2bfb1783ceb7eead5f3504db86c7eb/
- Chicago
- Neves, Maria Inês Branquinho da Costa. Direito Internacional do Ambiente e Direitos da Natureza : dos discursos antropocêntricos a uma abordagem biocêntrica. 2019. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-4f2bfb1783ceb7eead5f3504db86c7eb/
- ISO 690
- Neves, Maria Inês Branquinho da Costa. Direito Internacional do Ambiente e Direitos da Natureza : dos discursos antropocêntricos a uma abordagem biocêntrica. 2019. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-4f2bfb1783ceb7eead5f3504db86c7eb/
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Direito Internacional do Ambiente e Direitos da Natureza : dos discursos antropocêntricos a uma abordagem biocêntrica. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-4f2bfb1783ceb7eead5f3504db86c7eb/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 4bd4b4dfa8427a34 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:19.386358+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.147916+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:19.386358+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.147916+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:19.386358+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.147916+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:19.386358+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.645097+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:19.386358+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.147916+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
5fd2295632d17754 · 2026-11-09T19:08:19.386358+00:00
75a94b9fb19b7941 · 2026-11-09T19:08:19.386358+00:00
76e3402f8f8918af · 2026-11-09T19:08:19.386358+00:00
d0ef2372705df526 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.147916+00:00
4bd4b4dfa8427a34 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.147916+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Neves, Maria Inês Branquinho da Costa
Source roles
Discovery source · http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/30395
Discovery source · https://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/30395
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7027853529
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.