UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

Starboard or port tack? : navigating a course to recognition and reconciliation of aboriginal title to ocean spaces

Identification

Public canonical key
doi:10.14288/1.0077562
Authors
Brown, C. Rebecca
Reported year
2009
Reported language
en
Source type
dissertation
First detected
2026-11-09T19:04:47.783174+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-09T19:04:47.783174+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

In British Columbia, fifty-one First Nations have filed Statements of Intent signifying their interest in negotiating a treaty with Canada and the Province of British Columbia since the establishment of the British Columbia Treaty Commission in 1993. Twenty-seven of these First Nations participants claim ocean spaces within their traditional territories. Academic research and writing over the last decade has focussed on Aboriginal title to land, with little, if any reference, to ocean spaces. The concept of Aboriginal title was recently recognized by the courts in Delgamuukw v. British Columbia. My research will explore what information and legal principles could be utilized to recognize Aboriginal title to ocean spaces within the Canadian legal context, and therefore provide some bases for First Nations in substantiating their claims. My analysis will begin with a review of international law principles surrounding title to and jurisdiction over ocean spaces. Following which, I will delineate the sources available for recognizing such a theory, starting with a review of the concepts of Aboriginal title as determined in Delgamuukw and their applicability to ocean spaces. Delgamuukw has affirmed Aboriginal perspectives are an integral part of the investigation of Aboriginal title, and voices of members of two particular First Nations being the Haida Nation and the Tsawwassen First Nation, with whom I visited, will be included. Rounding out the sources will be a review of comparative legal concepts drawn from the United States and Australian experiences, and the principles espoused within international human rights materials. Having established the avenues for recognition of this concept, I then turn to discussion of its reconciliation within the Canadian legal context by reviewing theories of co-management and examining a number of settlement instruments that have yielded some degree of reconciliation between the federal government and the particular First Nation or Province involved. Comments from First Nations in respect of the obstacles that hold back reconciliation will be noted. In conclusion, my research will deduce Aboriginal title to ocean spaces is a viable legal concept in Canada, and First Nations have the resources necessary to substantiate their claims. Comments about the possibilities that may result at the treaty table or in the courts upon recognition of this concept will also be discussed. This analysis is timely and important as many First Nations are nearing the stage of the treaty process where discussions will be directed towards what territories these First Nations groups will retain and what ownership, jurisdiction and rights they will enjoy as to ocean spaces and resources. Such issues directly relate to the continued way of life, culture, and sustainable economic growth and stability of First Nation communities into the twenty-first century.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
W2269680374
DOI
10.14288/1.0077562
HANDLE
2429/5593

Documentary context

Documentary family
Thesis
Source-reported types
dissertation
Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
CA · US
Natural entities mentioned
Ocean · Territory

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3

Documentary field provenance

Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.

Title
Documentary source reported
Publication
Documentary source reported
Authors
Documentary source reported
Document type
Documentary source reported
Jurisdiction
Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
Court
Not recorded
Issuing authority
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
DOI
Documentary source reported
ISBN
Not recorded
Official identifier
Not recorded
Source URL
Documentary source reported
Source-reported status
Not recorded
Amendment / repeal
Not recorded

Cite this reference

Brown, C. Rebecca. Starboard or port tack? : navigating a course to recognition and reconciliation of aboriginal title to ocean spaces. 2009. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0077562

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Brown, C. Rebecca. (2009). Starboard or port tack? : navigating a course to recognition and reconciliation of aboriginal title to ocean spaces. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0077562
Chicago
Brown, C. Rebecca. Starboard or port tack? : navigating a course to recognition and reconciliation of aboriginal title to ocean spaces. 2009. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0077562
ISO 690
Brown, C. Rebecca. Starboard or port tack? : navigating a course to recognition and reconciliation of aboriginal title to ocean spaces. 2009. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0077562

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Starboard or port tack? : navigating a course to recognition and reconciliation of aboriginal title to ocean spaces. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-4eb63d4fcae8b144ed0b360d9b4d9ead/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Field provenance and record version

Version e095030b40f6fbfa · udtr-reference-1.1.2

Title
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.783174+00:00
Authors
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.783174+00:00
Year
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.783174+00:00
Identifiers
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.783174+00:00
Source URL
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.783174+00:00

History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.

b598ecf83d5445c7 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.783174+00:00

2ce047583659d00f · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.783174+00:00

d1377bc26dc18338 · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.783174+00:00

e095030b40f6fbfa · 2026-11-09T19:04:47.783174+00:00

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

CA · US ·

Brown, C. Rebecca

Source roles

Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0077562

Discovery source · https://hdl.handle.net/2429/5593

Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2269680374

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library