Earth Jurisprudence, Wild Law, Emergent Law: The Emerging Field of Ecology and Law—Part 1
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1007/s10991-014-9148-1
- Authors
- Jamie
- Reported year
- 2014
- Reported language
- en · eng
- Source type
- Article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.541218+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-10T16:58:51.109969+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Lancaster University
Reported affiliation countries
GB
Documentary abstract — original language
The article does two things. First, it explores the emerging field of ecology and law through the examination of Earth Jurisprudence developed in the work of Berry, Cullinan, and Burdon. Second, it puts this Earth Jurisprudence and the emerging field of ecology and law in connection with the wide ranging philosophical work of Deleuze and Guattari. Earth Jurisprudence and the emerging field of ecology and law are introduced through the exploration of four themes that characterise the field of study: a critique of the dominant western worldview and image of thought; a new philosophy of nature widely informed by contemporary science and cosmology; a new relation to the Earth and nature in affectual intensities, image of thinking, and investment of the social field; and, the realisation of the necessity and centrality of a fundamental reconceptualization of legality and governance. The Earth Jurisprudence of Berry, Cullinan, and Burdon (particularly Cullinan’s Wild Law: A Manifesto for Earth Justice) is then explored substantively in Cullinan’s reconceptualization of legality, the Grand Jurisprudence that informs Earth Jurisprudence, the Earth Jurisprudence of the promotion of mutual ecocentric human-Earth enhancement, the development of Earth rights, the reconceptualization of property and land, and the Wild Law that Earth Jurisprudence produces as the outcome of its creativity. Earth Jurisprudence and the emerging field of ecology and law are a far-reaching development within legal studies, with potentially profound implications for our contemporary conceptualisation of legality and governance and the creation of a concept of law for a new Earth. When put into connection with the wide ranging philosophical joint work of Deleuze and Guattari there emerge striking commonalities, convergences, and a common jurisprudential project of the creation of a legality for a new Earth. The article concludes with the argument that the work of Deleuze and Guattari could provide a key resource for the development of Earth Jurisprudence and the emerging field of ecology and law, particularly the Deleuze and Guattari jurisprudential concept of emergent law.
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10991-014-9148-1
- OPENALEX
- W1984059278
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::3c82525993fecdb111ffd584c7ce48d7
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1498727162 · CITES
- openalex:w1499980340 · CITES
- openalex:w1503216460 · CITES
- openalex:w1567353862 · CITES
- openalex:w1601736244 · CITES
- openalex:w1782157152 · CITES
- openalex:w1922708772 · CITES
- openalex:w2064550997 · CITES
- openalex:w2114574703 · CITES
- openalex:w2143731336 · CITES
- openalex:w2295722847 · CITES
- openalex:w2318477088 · CITES
- openalex:w2752046830 · CITES
- Exploring Wild Law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence · CITES
- openalex:w2801681773 · CITES
- Wild Law — In Practice · CITES
- openalex:w3027234447 · CITES
- openalex:w3158445523 · CITES
- openalex:w4236137442 · CITES
- openalex:w4237410285 · CITES
18 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Jamie. Earth Jurisprudence, Wild Law, Emergent Law: The Emerging Field of Ecology and Law—Part 1. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-014-9148-1
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Jamie. (2014). Earth Jurisprudence, Wild Law, Emergent Law: The Emerging Field of Ecology and Law—Part 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-014-9148-1
- Chicago
- Jamie. Earth Jurisprudence, Wild Law, Emergent Law: The Emerging Field of Ecology and Law—Part 1. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-014-9148-1
- ISO 690
- Jamie. Earth Jurisprudence, Wild Law, Emergent Law: The Emerging Field of Ecology and Law—Part 1. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-014-9148-1
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Earth Jurisprudence, Wild Law, Emergent Law: The Emerging Field of Ecology and Law—Part 1. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-4e03c96b7599e8b164916dfd60f592c8/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 3b9ca5140f288ee5 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.304718+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.109969+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.304718+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.109969+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.304718+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.109969+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.304718+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.109969+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.304718+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.109969+00:00 - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.109969+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
01fb1335e459a69d · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.304718+00:00
534538d60ea80681 · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.304718+00:00
150da254034c850b · 2026-11-09T19:11:02.304718+00:00
cd3fef937bdd4995 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.109969+00:00
3b9ca5140f288ee5 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.109969+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-014-9148-1
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W1984059278
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Documentary validated