Can Nature Be a Legal Person: Perspectives on Rights of Rivers, Forests, and Ecosystems
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.5281/zenodo.24019605
- Authors
- Vishnu Yadav
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en · und
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.527432+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:11:06.551236+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
The growing ecological crisis, characterized by climate change, biodiversity loss, deforestation, pollution, and degradation of freshwater ecosystems, has prompted renewed debate regarding the adequacy of conventional environmental law. Traditional legal systems generally treat nature as property or a resource subject to human ownership and exploitation, providing protection primarily through regulatory mechanisms designed to control environmental harm. In recent decades, however, several jurisdictions have adopted an innovative legal approach by recognizing rivers, forests, ecosystems, and other natural entities as legal persons possessing enforceable rights. This emerging doctrine, commonly known as the Rights of Nature, represents a significant shift from anthropocentric environmental governance toward an ecocentric legal framework that acknowledges the intrinsic value of the natural world. This paper critically examines the evolution of legal personhood for nature from the perspectives of environmental law, constitutional law, jurisprudence, and comparative legal studies. It analyses the philosophical foundations of the Rights of Nature movement, evaluates judicial and legislative developments in jurisdictions including Ecuador, New Zealand, Colombia, India, and the United States, and assesses the legal implications of granting personhood to rivers, forests, and ecosystems. The paper further explores the challenges associated with representation, enforcement, constitutional compatibility, indigenous rights, property ownership, and environmental governance. Finally, it proposes legislative and institutional reforms aimed at developing a coherent legal framework capable of recognizing the rights of nature while balancing ecological protection, sustainable development, and human interests.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7225383636
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.24019605 · 10.5281/zenodo.24019606
- OPENAIRE
- od______2659::3db110567537defa08717af643d1411e
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · JournalArticle · article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- CO · EC · IN · NZ · US
- Natural entities mentioned
- River · Forest · Ecosystem
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
DataCite · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3 · Record 4
OpenAIRE · Record 1 · Record 2
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24019605
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24019606
- Document · https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.24019605
- Document · https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.24019606
- Document · https://zenodo.org/records/24019606
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W7225383636
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Instrument versions and official source
Source unresolved
Documentary identity verification only: a link or date establishes neither full-text verification, legal effect nor current force.
Possible duplicate awaiting documentary verification.
Status from the preserved documentary extraction: Unestablished
Cite this reference
Vishnu Yadav. Can Nature Be a Legal Person: Perspectives on Rights of Rivers, Forests, and Ecosystems. 2026. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3e8db0cc386bfbdca8c729158abdf634/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Vishnu Yadav. (2026). Can Nature Be a Legal Person: Perspectives on Rights of Rivers, Forests, and Ecosystems. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3e8db0cc386bfbdca8c729158abdf634/
- Chicago
- Vishnu Yadav. Can Nature Be a Legal Person: Perspectives on Rights of Rivers, Forests, and Ecosystems. 2026. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3e8db0cc386bfbdca8c729158abdf634/
- ISO 690
- Vishnu Yadav. Can Nature Be a Legal Person: Perspectives on Rights of Rivers, Forests, and Ecosystems. 2026. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3e8db0cc386bfbdca8c729158abdf634/
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Can Nature Be a Legal Person: Perspectives on Rights of Rivers, Forests, and Ecosystems. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3e8db0cc386bfbdca8c729158abdf634/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 48cabe629c18d389 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:35.096534+00:00
DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:35.096373+00:00 - Authors
- DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:35.096534+00:00
DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:35.096373+00:00 - Year
- DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:35.096534+00:00
DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:35.096373+00:00 - Identifiers
- DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:35.096534+00:00
DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:35.096373+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:35.096534+00:00
DataCite · source · 2026-11-09T19:05:35.096373+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained.
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
d785d76455e9cb8e · 2026-11-09T19:11:06.551236+00:00
616bf25a910d2b9f · 2026-11-09T19:11:06.551236+00:00
aaa093ee1d63562e · 2026-11-09T19:11:06.551236+00:00
48cabe629c18d389 · 2026-11-09T19:11:06.551236+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24019605
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24019606
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.24019605
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.24019606
Discovery source · https://zenodo.org/records/24019606
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7225383636
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Documentary validated