How Law Shapes Collaborative Forest Governance: A Focus on Indigenous Peoples in Canada and India
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1605433
- Authors
- William D. Nikolakis · Ngaio Hotte
- Reported year
- 2019
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of British Columbia
Documentary abstract — original language
Growing recognition of Indigenous Peoples’ legal rights to forests has motivated an increase in collaborative forest governance in recent decades. Collaborative governance literature, however, has paid little attention to the influence of legal approaches. This paper explores two legal instruments, constitutionally entrenched rights and statutory rights, and their influence on six elements of collaborative governance identified in literature: starting conditions, institutional design, facilitative leadership, collaborative process, systems context and outcomes. In Canada, constitutionally entrenched and collective Indigenous rights are interpreted by the courts, resulting in a complex body of jurisprudence. Statutory rights in India are not constitutionally protected and focus on the individual, rather than the collective. In both countries, these legal instruments address conflict, injustice and forest access, and have led to the establishment of different forms of collaborative forest governance.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2944107918
- DOI
- 10.1080/08941920.2019.1605433
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- CA · IN
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1548860710 · CITES
- Democratic Assertions: The Making of India's Recognition of Forest Rights Act · CITES
- openalex:w1727457849 · CITES
- openalex:w1814793474 · CITES
- openalex:w1963631397 · CITES
- openalex:w1965308704 · CITES
- openalex:w1990022613 · CITES
- openalex:w1992694808 · CITES
- openalex:w1994584513 · CITES
- openalex:w1996392459 · CITES
- openalex:w2005548596 · CITES
- openalex:w2029208444 · CITES
- Decentralisation and democratic forest reforms in India: Moving to a rights-based approach · CITES
- openalex:w2055464537 · CITES
- openalex:w2057842353 · CITES
- openalex:w2058301091 · CITES
- openalex:w2067515718 · CITES
- openalex:w2075706317 · CITES
- openalex:w2080171783 · CITES
- openalex:w2092269694 · CITES
5 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
William D. Nikolakis; Ngaio Hotte. How Law Shapes Collaborative Forest Governance: A Focus on Indigenous Peoples in Canada and India. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1605433
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- William D. Nikolakis; Ngaio Hotte. (2019). How Law Shapes Collaborative Forest Governance: A Focus on Indigenous Peoples in Canada and India. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1605433
- Chicago
- William D. Nikolakis; Ngaio Hotte. How Law Shapes Collaborative Forest Governance: A Focus on Indigenous Peoples in Canada and India. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1605433
- ISO 690
- William D. Nikolakis; Ngaio Hotte. How Law Shapes Collaborative Forest Governance: A Focus on Indigenous Peoples in Canada and India. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1605433
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. How Law Shapes Collaborative Forest Governance: A Focus on Indigenous Peoples in Canada and India. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3e795441ffb2e6dd24d7a5e9023aaaf7/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 48de3987ecec0ce4 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
b4044df07dfb91c9 · 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
b4c4e7c281a3f77b · 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
331bf367137b39ff · 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
48de3987ecec0ce4 · 2026-11-09T19:12:00.541131+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
University of British Columbia
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1605433
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2944107918
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.