Are Rights of Nature Working?
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.17176/20240808-152106-0
- Authors
- Rodríguez-Garavito, César · De Bona, Melina
- Reported year
- 2024
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- Text
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.869694+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-10T16:58:51.000953+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
Legal initiatives recognizing the rights of nature have transformed from a trickle to a cascade. But are they really effective? A systematic study on the implementation of the Ecuadorian Los Cedros ruling, one of the most prominent decisions of this sort, shows that it has been notably effective in protecting the forest from mining threats. However, its impact on local community involvement has been limited, and the fate of Los Cedros and the case remain vulnerable.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W6887617919
- DOI
- 10.17176/20240808-152106-0 · 10.59704/7bd6f8c268de163a
- OPENAIRE
- doi_dedup___::ea777175e0bf75e83c928a447000b781
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Other
- Source-reported types
- Article · Text · preprint
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
DataCite · Record 1
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.17176/20240808-152106-0
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.59704/7bd6f8c268de163a
- OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W6887617919
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
2 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Rodríguez-Garavito, César; De Bona, Melina. Are Rights of Nature Working?. 2024. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3b8bf16560b59a39e95d6794a8ccc4b2/
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Rodríguez-Garavito, César; De Bona, Melina. (2024). Are Rights of Nature Working?. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3b8bf16560b59a39e95d6794a8ccc4b2/
- Chicago
- Rodríguez-Garavito, César; De Bona, Melina. Are Rights of Nature Working?. 2024. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3b8bf16560b59a39e95d6794a8ccc4b2/
- ISO 690
- Rodríguez-Garavito, César; De Bona, Melina. Are Rights of Nature Working?. 2024. https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3b8bf16560b59a39e95d6794a8ccc4b2/
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Are Rights of Nature Working?. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3b8bf16560b59a39e95d6794a8ccc4b2/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version fd324448c7a110b5 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- DataCite · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402003+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.314242+00:00 - Authors
- DataCite · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402003+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.314242+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- DataCite · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402003+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.314242+00:00 - Identifiers
- DataCite · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402003+00:00
OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.314242+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:19.314242+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.000953+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
6770ade328b1da53 · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402003+00:00
7a123ff2cdc1d354 · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402003+00:00
4b282c1e1cfd6411 · 2026-11-10T01:26:20.402003+00:00
31ea3e291cbe990c · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.000953+00:00
fd324448c7a110b5 · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.000953+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.17176/20240808-152106-0
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.59704/7bd6f8c268de163a
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W6887617919
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.