UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

An evaluation of Wilhelm Heinse's style and language

Identification

Public canonical key

openalex:w3010045055

Authors

Rosemarie Elliott

Reported year

1989

Reported language

en

Source type

dissertation

First detected

2026-11-09T19:12:02.594959+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:12:02.594959+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

In the introduction to this thesis attention is drawn to the difficulties of classification concerning Wilhelm Heinse's work, a factor which is found to be in turn contributing to his undeserved obscurity. The proposed solution to the problem, namely, making Heinse's style and language the key by which to gain recognition for him, is supported by reference to an extensive appendix. The chapter-based examination of Heinse's lightning, storm, and fire imagery is explained. Chapter I uses Heinse's Stanzen and Wieland's Idris und Zenide as a main base for comparison (a method of comparison having been adopted as best for showing the new-ness of Heinse). Heinse's different, often boldly new expressiveness and his advance beyond Wieland are demonstrated. Heinse's lightning imagery serves to define the "Genie" concept. Chapter II concentrates on Heinse's Gemahldebriefe, where, in their indirect function as a polemic against Winkkelmann's aesthetic teachings, Heinse achieves new heights for the descriptive word, showing himself to be equivalent in his medium to a "bildender Kunstler". The concurrent focus on Heinse's storm imagery brings with it a detailed discussion of the concept of the "Schwarmer", and of that of the "grosser Mensch" as manifested in Rubens. Chapter III compares the language of Heinse's Ardinghello with that of Goethe's Die Leiden des jungen Werthers, and defines Heinse's distance from Empfindsamkeit. With the focus on fire, the element with special affinity to Ardinghello, and to Heinse, the trilogy of imagery Lightning - Storm - Fire is completed. Heinse's Nature descriptions are found to confirm his outstanding verbal mastery whether relaying Nature's "hochstes Leben" or its serene beauty. An underlying profound aesthetic awareness is shown to be a crucial component in the factors making up the special quality of Heinse's language. The conclusion finds Heinse's style and language to fit at times into that of the Sturm und Drang, but in general to be uniquely "Heinsean", informed by a genuine insight into art and classical culture, a feeling for beauty, an emphasis on life and motion, a vitalistic and erotic, ecstatic cosmic vision - and the abilty to captivate the reader by his unsurpassed descriptive artistry.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W3010045055

Documentary context

Documentary family

Thesis

Source-reported types

dissertation

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• Document · http://theses.gla.ac.uk/77987/1/11003332.pdf
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W3010045055

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.