Indigenous peoples and REDD+ safeguards: rights as resistance or as disciplinary inclusion in the green economy?
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.4337/jhre.2016.02.01
- Authors
- Julia Dehm
- Reported year
- 2016
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
The University of Texas System
Documentary abstract — original language
This article critically evaluates the discourses concerning the social impacts of Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) carbon offset schemes on people living in and around forest areas. In particular, the article critically evaluates two of the strategies proposed to mitigate potential social risks from REDD+ and to promote benefits to forest peoples and indigenous peoples: tenure reform and processes of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC). The article suggests that these strategies may not lead to the outcomes forest peoples and their advocates are seeking and provide only constrained tools for contesting REDD+ projects. This article suggests these strategies may instead operate to facilitate the greater disciplinary inclusion of forest peoples in the so-called ‘green economy’.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W2536054658
- DOI
- 10.4337/jhre.2016.02.01
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1505091764 · CITES
- openalex:w1506306898 · CITES
- openalex:w1564153028 · CITES
- openalex:w1966503847 · CITES
- openalex:w1996545933 · CITES
- openalex:w2028921394 · CITES
- openalex:w2035713188 · CITES
- openalex:w2039510076 · CITES
- openalex:w2051676373 · CITES
- openalex:w2074882114 · CITES
- openalex:w2088679773 · CITES
- openalex:w2124325359 · CITES
- openalex:w2132755292 · CITES
- openalex:w2136774757 · CITES
- openalex:w2138815165 · CITES
- openalex:w2146826537 · CITES
- openalex:w2279095425 · CITES
- openalex:w2323125668 · CITES
- openalex:w2345325777 · CITES
- openalex:w259984835 · CITES
4 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Julia Dehm. Indigenous peoples and REDD+ safeguards: rights as resistance or as disciplinary inclusion in the green economy?. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2016.02.01
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Julia Dehm. (2016). Indigenous peoples and REDD+ safeguards: rights as resistance or as disciplinary inclusion in the green economy?. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2016.02.01
- Chicago
- Julia Dehm. Indigenous peoples and REDD+ safeguards: rights as resistance or as disciplinary inclusion in the green economy?. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2016.02.01
- ISO 690
- Julia Dehm. Indigenous peoples and REDD+ safeguards: rights as resistance or as disciplinary inclusion in the green economy?. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2016.02.01
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Indigenous peoples and REDD+ safeguards: rights as resistance or as disciplinary inclusion in the green economy?. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-3085d46d2d2ab0f2cd32fa18076b7732/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version b7932d492d5c0939 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
80f956a0ee8d15f2 · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
043e0bfce6854ec8 · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
322d49680f932a50 · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
b7932d492d5c0939 · 2026-11-09T19:18:18.056388+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
The University of Texas System
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2016.02.01
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W2536054658
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.