UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Artificial Intelligence, Legal Culture, and the Indonesian Formal Legal System: Negotiating Norms in The Regulation of Emerging Technologies

Identification

Public canonical key

doi:10.64753/jcasc.v10i3.2439

Authors

Dyah Permata Budi Asri · Irmanjaya Thaher · Riya Widayanti

Reported year

2025

Reported language

en

Source type

article

First detected

2026-11-09T19:04:47.978780+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:04:47.978780+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Institutions reported by the source

Universitas Esa Unggul

Reported affiliation countries

ID

Documentary abstract — original language

This study explores the dynamic interaction between Indonesia’s cultural norms and the formal legal system in governing artificial intelligence (AI). Although legal frameworks for AI in Indonesia remain fragmented, socio-cultural values particularly collective responsibility, moral harmony, and social ethics significantly influence how law is understood, implemented, and contested. Using a qualitative socio legal approach, this research examines how cultural patterns shape the perception of AI accountability, legal personhood, and state regulation. Field observations and interviews with legal experts, policymakers, and cultural practitioners reveal that Indonesia’s legal response to AI is not only determined by statutory law but also embedded in the moral and ethical expectations of society. The study argues that Indonesia’s approach reflects a pluralistic legal culture where modern legal rationality interacts with communal values rooted in tradition. This hybridity presents both opportunities and challenges for developing AI governance that is legally sound yet culturally resonant. The findings highlight the need for a culturally adaptive legal framework that bridges formal regulation with local wisdom, ensuring ethical, inclusive, and socially legitimate AI governance in Indonesia.

Identifiers

OPENALEX

W4416823267

DOI

10.64753/jcasc.v10i3.2439

Documentary context

Documentary family

Scholarship

Source-reported types

article

Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources

ID

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i3.2439
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W4416823267

Documented bibliographic relations

Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.

• openalex:w2936121504 · CITES
• openalex:w2954606886 · CITES
• openalex:w3001278417 · CITES
• openalex:w3154288259 · CITES
• openalex:w4282546702 · CITES
• openalex:w4391696296 · CITES

1 incoming references within the detected corpus

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.