Assessing the Impact of Customary Ownership of Trees and Socioeconomic Factors on the Participatory Forest Management in Jharkhand, India
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1007/s00267-025-02129-x
- Authors
- Sabyasachi Kar · Mukti Ram Subedi · Parag Kadam · Puneet Dwivedi
- Reported year
- 2025
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Clemson University · University of Georgia
Documentary abstract — original language
Customary ownership over trees on forested public lands is a traditional practice that grants individuals or groups rights and duties to access, use, and manage trees. This unique ownership model, where the Indian Government owns the forested land, but trees on that land are customarily owned by the households or community, plays a critical role in community participation in Participatory Forest Management (PFM). No study has yet quantitatively analyzed the relationship between customary ownership over trees and participation in PFM activities. Therefore, this study fills this gap by analyzing the relationship between households' participation in PFM, the number of trees under customary ownership on forested public lands, and socioeconomic variables in Jharkhand, India. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and participatory rural appraisal. Factor analysis and multivariate linear regression were employed to analyze this relationship. We found that households' customary ownership over a higher number of trees enabled them to earn a higher income and motivated them to relocate for better education and healthcare access, resulting in reduced PFM participation. Households with larger forest landholdings participated more regularly in PFM activities, motivated to legalize ownership of their long-used forestlands. Displaced households experienced reduced PFM participation. Higher caste and wealth groups were associated with greater PFM participation due to better resource access and stronger decision-making power. The study findings inform policymakers to improve inclusive participation in PFM activities and provide a pathway for achieving India's environmental commitments by reducing socioeconomic disparities, improving tribal livelihoods, and promoting sustainable management of forestry resources.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W4407806521
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00267-025-02129-x
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- IN
- Natural entities mentioned
- Forest
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1551316950 · CITES
- openalex:w1751694129 · CITES
- openalex:w189916372 · CITES
- openalex:w1913957972 · CITES
- openalex:w1963825985 · CITES
- openalex:w1967899853 · CITES
- openalex:w1970098664 · CITES
- openalex:w2036873208 · CITES
- openalex:w2046251591 · CITES
- openalex:w2048559988 · CITES
- openalex:w2053295183 · CITES
- openalex:w2071206993 · CITES
- openalex:w2076926005 · CITES
- openalex:w2081453044 · CITES
- openalex:w2090301443 · CITES
- openalex:w2091159904 · CITES
- openalex:w2092107914 · CITES
- openalex:w2095114594 · CITES
- openalex:w2102699022 · CITES
- openalex:w2114858704 · CITES
1 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Sabyasachi Kar; Mukti Ram Subedi; Parag Kadam; Puneet Dwivedi. Assessing the Impact of Customary Ownership of Trees and Socioeconomic Factors on the Participatory Forest Management in Jharkhand, India. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02129-x
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Sabyasachi Kar; Mukti Ram Subedi; Parag Kadam; Puneet Dwivedi. (2025). Assessing the Impact of Customary Ownership of Trees and Socioeconomic Factors on the Participatory Forest Management in Jharkhand, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02129-x
- Chicago
- Sabyasachi Kar; Mukti Ram Subedi; Parag Kadam; Puneet Dwivedi. Assessing the Impact of Customary Ownership of Trees and Socioeconomic Factors on the Participatory Forest Management in Jharkhand, India. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02129-x
- ISO 690
- Sabyasachi Kar; Mukti Ram Subedi; Parag Kadam; Puneet Dwivedi. Assessing the Impact of Customary Ownership of Trees and Socioeconomic Factors on the Participatory Forest Management in Jharkhand, India. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02129-x
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Assessing the Impact of Customary Ownership of Trees and Socioeconomic Factors on the Participatory Forest Management in Jharkhand, India. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2e91233c4ff874a395900a56e94ff26d/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version f110db5056706afd · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
5e51f160c7c4e26e · 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
b6d765f4bc319b0c · 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
5606cb89bd48dec9 · 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
f110db5056706afd · 2026-11-09T19:16:16.844960+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
IN ·
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02129-x
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W4407806521
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Detected scholarly publication
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.