UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Desarrollo de actividades acuícolas dentro del área protegida reserva ecológica Manglares de Churute en Ecuador

Identification

Public canonical key

doi:10.57998/bdigital/handle.001.1304

Authors

Xavier Andrés

Reported year

2023

Reported language

es · esl/spa

Source type

Other literature type

First detected

2026-11-09T19:04:47.652855+00:00

Last metadata observation

2026-11-09T19:07:36.435264+00:00

Last HTTP verification

Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

This article presents an analysis of the development and potentiation of aquaculture activities in the country and the involvement of ecological reserves for their implementation, in consideration of the fundamental pillars of sustainable development (enviromental, economic, social and cultural) widely developed and contemplated in the Ecuadorian Consitution of the Republic. For such purpose, the analysis of the particular case of the Manglares de Churute Ecological Reserve has been considered, showing an attractive panorama to reliably elucidate the legal, economic and ecological barriers that the Guayas´s Provincial Directorate of the Environment erroneously pointed out at denying the viability of a successful project, later being protected by means of a sentence within the judgment number 09281-2019-02939 that allowed the protection of nature as a subject of rights by a constitutional case. El presente artículo muestra un análisis sobre el desarrollo y potencialización de las actividades acuícolas en el país y la implicación de las reservas ecológicas para su realización, considerando los pilares fundamentales del desarrollo sostenible (ambiental, económico, social y cultural) ampliamente desarrollados y contemplados en la Constitución del Ecuador. Para tal efecto, se ha considerado el análisis del caso particular de la Reserva Ecológica Manglares de Churute, que ostenta un panorama atractivo para dilucidar fehacientemente las barreras jurídicas, económicas y ecológicas que la Dirección Provincial del Ambiente del Guayas erróneamente señaló, negando la viabilidad de un proyecto exitoso, que posteriormente fue tutelado mediante sentencia dentro del juicio número 09281-2019-02939 que permitió la protección de la naturaleza como sujeto de derecho en sede constitucional. Magíster en Derecho del Estado con énfasis en Derecho de los Recursos Naturales Maestría

Identifiers

OPENAIRE

dedup_wf_002::15f63c8deec62faff3866e4c9795fe4a · doi_________::9cbf0587a69d9dc7aab6ef3f89faa20d

DOI

10.57998/bdigital/handle.001.1304

OPENALEX

W6898729566

Documentary context

Documentary family

Other

Source-reported types

Other ORP type · Other literature type · dissertation

Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources

EC

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAIRE · Record 1 · Record 2

OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2

• DOI · https://doi.org/10.57998/bdigital/handle.001.1304
• Document · https://dx.doi.org/10.57998/bdigital/handle.001.1304
• OpenAlex · https://openalex.org/W6898729566

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.