Indigenous led biodiversity litigation in the extractives context
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1080/13642987.2026.2729173
- Authors
- Fatimazahra Dehbi · Olga Martin‐Ortega
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.668454+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
University of London
Reported affiliation countries
GB
Documentary abstract — original language
Litigation focusing on advancing Indigenous Peoples’ rights, or provision of remedy where these rights have been impacted, often relies on a combination of legal frameworks and principles across international environmental law, international human rights law, biodiversity law and national indigenous rights law. This is apparent in the extractives context where Indigenous Peoples have sought to challenge the continued violations and a constant lack of recognition of their rights, whilst also simultaneously advancing the protection of biodiversity. Some cases have focused on failures to consult, whilst others have focused on impacts to Indigenous Peoples’ rights, as well as biocultural rights and the rights of nature. This article discusses five cases where Indigenous People have litigated for the protection of biodiversity in the extractive context and further explores the potential to advance the interpretation of legal principles and obligations in order to protect both human life and the planet we inhabit.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7213283423
- DOI
- 10.1080/13642987.2026.2729173
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- Community stewardship: the foundation of biocultural rights · CITES
- New Transitions from Human Rights to the Environment to the Rights of Nature · CITES
- Can Rights of Nature Make Development More Sustainable? Why Some Ecuadorian lawsuits Succeed and Others Fail · CITES
- openalex:w2774003070 · CITES
- Creating legal rights for rivers: Lessons from Australia, New Zealand, and India · CITES
- openalex:w2800845029 · CITES
- openalex:w2901373102 · CITES
- Constitutional law, ecosystems, and indigenous peoples in Colombia: biocultural rights and legal subjects · CITES
- openalex:w3093764998 · CITES
- Rights of Nature in Practice: A Case Study on the Impacts of the Colombian Atrato River Decision · CITES
- openalex:w3205558015 · CITES
- Towards a Business, Human Rights and the Environment Framework · CITES
- openalex:w4293177481 · CITES
- openalex:w4293177735 · CITES
- openalex:w4293177828 · CITES
- openalex:w4300518475 · CITES
- A Rights Turn in Biodiversity Litigation? · CITES
- openalex:w4399562689 · CITES
- openalex:w4415815084 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Fatimazahra Dehbi; Olga Martin‐Ortega. Indigenous led biodiversity litigation in the extractives context. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2026.2729173
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Fatimazahra Dehbi; Olga Martin‐Ortega. (2026). Indigenous led biodiversity litigation in the extractives context. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2026.2729173
- Chicago
- Fatimazahra Dehbi; Olga Martin‐Ortega. Indigenous led biodiversity litigation in the extractives context. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2026.2729173
- ISO 690
- Fatimazahra Dehbi; Olga Martin‐Ortega. Indigenous led biodiversity litigation in the extractives context. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2026.2729173
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Indigenous led biodiversity litigation in the extractives context. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2ba25186754e2dbe5848b6ceebb57f88/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 697a97b3670a6772 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
7a536a8670e7a3a2 · 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
e60fa10af1af4c36 · 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
c29fb396826b6f38 · 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
697a97b3670a6772 · 2026-11-09T19:12:04.768867+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2026.2729173
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7213283423
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.