Global Environmental Governance and Rights of Nature Discourses in an Age of Deglobalisation: People, Planet, and Power
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1007/s40647-026-00470-x
- Authors
- Eva‐Maria Nag
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:04:47.951945+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-10T16:58:51.460111+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Durham University
Reported affiliation countries
GB
Documentary abstract — original language
Abstract This paper discusses the gradual but growing convergence of global environmental governance (GEG) with ideational innovations, specifically focusing on the Rights of Nature (RoN) discourses. The first, uncontroversial claim is that the 20th and early 21st century regime of GEG has failed to resolve the most significant environmental crises of our times. Second, deglobalisation as a period of heightened political contestation and counter-current thinking is also marked by increasing awareness and recognition of non-human actors. This context of continuity and change enables the emergence of conceptual and legal innovations such as the RoN that go beyond anthropocentric and growth-focused conceptualisations of sustainability. Third, although the content of these discourses is not uniform across the world, all variations of the RoN speak to the subjectivity and agency of nature while also invoking legal rights as effective tools for resisting domination by extractive elites and institutional power. The analysis of the impact of RoN discourses on GEG draws on Ranajit Guha’s theoretical framework of dominance and hegemony as contingent relations of power. The original framework is developed further to incorporate nature as a new actor alongside suppressed groups who now have greater visibility and influence in an age of pluralism and polycentricity. This analytical lens sheds light on the complexity and fluidity of indeterminate relationships of domination and resistance among elites, subalterns, and nature. Following from this, the fourth claim is that the impact of these discourses on environmental governance is more likely to be meliorative rather than radical. RoN discourses provide a basis for correctives to norms and policies, as well as checks on power instead of creating a new type of global environmental regime. The emergent interconnections between GEG and RoN discourses are thus interpreted as ideational innovation ‘writ small’, though not as ‘rendered ineffective.’
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7163579324
- DOI
- 10.1007/s40647-026-00470-x
- OPENAIRE
- doi_________::5cd3faf69588a27710cea229bfc90d60
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- Article · article
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAIRE · Record 1
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1811212363 · CITES
- openalex:w2014504879 · CITES
- openalex:w2021883551 · CITES
- openalex:w2028109330 · CITES
- openalex:w2040848511 · CITES
- openalex:w2057604568 · CITES
- openalex:w2057811286 · CITES
- openalex:w2096885696 · CITES
- openalex:w2132209609 · CITES
- openalex:w2140375547 · CITES
- openalex:w2145303294 · CITES
- openalex:w2147744624 · CITES
- openalex:w2171772681 · CITES
- New Transitions from Human Rights to the Environment to the Rights of Nature · CITES
- The Rights of nature · CITES
- openalex:w2747224035 · CITES
- At the Intersection of the Sacred and the Legal: Rights for Nature in Uttarakhand, India · CITES
- openalex:w2768068294 · CITES
- openalex:w2771549989 · CITES
- openalex:w2911586160 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Not recorded
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Eva‐Maria Nag. Global Environmental Governance and Rights of Nature Discourses in an Age of Deglobalisation: People, Planet, and Power. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-026-00470-x
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Eva‐Maria Nag. (2026). Global Environmental Governance and Rights of Nature Discourses in an Age of Deglobalisation: People, Planet, and Power. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-026-00470-x
- Chicago
- Eva‐Maria Nag. Global Environmental Governance and Rights of Nature Discourses in an Age of Deglobalisation: People, Planet, and Power. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-026-00470-x
- ISO 690
- Eva‐Maria Nag. Global Environmental Governance and Rights of Nature Discourses in an Age of Deglobalisation: People, Planet, and Power. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-026-00470-x
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Global Environmental Governance and Rights of Nature Discourses in an Age of Deglobalisation: People, Planet, and Power. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-2aa62a73a5a7b2258083ba2571cc2ea9/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 0f605fb36f1c2bee · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.930682+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.460111+00:00 - Authors
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.930682+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.460111+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Year
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.930682+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.460111+00:00 - Identifiers
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.930682+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.460111+00:00
Multiple reported values; disagreement retained. - Source URL
- OpenAIRE · source · 2026-11-09T19:06:44.930682+00:00
OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.460111+00:00 - Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.460111+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
5c25e32e0f0fbb03 · 2026-11-09T19:14:45.212185+00:00
085228ed54605bec · 2026-11-09T19:14:45.212185+00:00
82661061788d5fd6 · 2026-11-09T19:14:45.212185+00:00
912d6c7fa5bc9b4b · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.460111+00:00
0f605fb36f1c2bee · 2026-11-10T16:58:51.460111+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-026-00470-x
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7163579324
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.