UDTR Global Radar

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Radar

Documentary registry of records detected across the scholarly, legal and institutional infrastructures monitored by UDTR.

A global documentary infrastructure designed to achieve the broadest verifiable and scientifically defensible coverage of the Rights of Nature.

← Back to Radar

DIGITAL JUSTICE AND THE UNCITRAL ODR FRAMEWORK: NORMATIVE FOUNDATIONS, INSTITUTIONAL LIMITS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Identification

Public canonical key
radar:r-1e8dede5e8e748bee6ee12aa45143ae3
Authors
Collins Ekpenisi · Christy Essien Ekpe Ph.D Christy Essien Ekpe Ph.D · Adekunle Saheed Abiola
Reported year
2026
Reported language
en
Source type
article
First detected
2026-11-13T12:39:49.193634+00:00
Last metadata observation
2026-11-13T12:39:49.193634+00:00
Last HTTP verification
Not checked

Documentary abstract — original language

Cross-border digital trades are now being conducted at unprecedented dimensions. But they are also simultaneously generating new dimensions of complex cross-border disputes. Consequently, Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), an essential component of digital justice, is being increasingly employed as a way of resolving cross-border disputes electronically. While the UNCITRAL has made significant contributions through establishing the normative foundations for e-commerce and ODR, there still exist many issues about how well suited is the governance model of UNCITRAL to deal with the increasing decentralisation of the digital economy. This paper assesses critically UNCITRAL's contribution to international ODR governance by assessing its normative foundations, institutional limitations, and potential role as a catalyst for digital justice. The study employed a qualitative doctrinal method, and a fair comparative approach, in assessing UNCITRAL's primary legal documents relating to ODR and the institutional experiences associated with the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), the EU Framework of ODR, and several private ODR service providers. Research indicated that while UNCITRAL was successful in developing internationally accepted legal principles for both e-commerce and ODR, it continues to be hampered institutionally through lack of authority over ODR institutions, reliance on voluntary compliance with soft law, and inability to address technology-related issues. Ultimately, this research found that an integrated governance model that combines UNCITRAL's normative influence with enhanced institutional coordination and cooperation among regional public authorities, alongside relevant private sector entities, provides a better mechanism for resolving cross border digital disputes.

Identifiers

OPENALEX
https://openalex.org/W7221123799
DOI
10.53704/f1gwwn52

Documentary context

Documentary family
article
Source-reported types
article

Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.

Sources

OpenAlex · Record 1

Cite this reference

Collins Ekpenisi; Christy Essien Ekpe Ph.D Christy Essien Ekpe Ph.D; Adekunle Saheed Abiola. DIGITAL JUSTICE AND THE UNCITRAL ODR FRAMEWORK: NORMATIVE FOUNDATIONS, INSTITUTIONAL LIMITS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS. 2026. https://doi.org/10.53704/f1gwwn52

JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·

APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.

APA
Collins Ekpenisi; Christy Essien Ekpe Ph.D Christy Essien Ekpe Ph.D; Adekunle Saheed Abiola. (2026). DIGITAL JUSTICE AND THE UNCITRAL ODR FRAMEWORK: NORMATIVE FOUNDATIONS, INSTITUTIONAL LIMITS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS. https://doi.org/10.53704/f1gwwn52
Chicago
Collins Ekpenisi; Christy Essien Ekpe Ph.D Christy Essien Ekpe Ph.D; Adekunle Saheed Abiola. DIGITAL JUSTICE AND THE UNCITRAL ODR FRAMEWORK: NORMATIVE FOUNDATIONS, INSTITUTIONAL LIMITS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS. 2026. https://doi.org/10.53704/f1gwwn52
ISO 690
Collins Ekpenisi; Christy Essien Ekpe Ph.D Christy Essien Ekpe Ph.D; Adekunle Saheed Abiola. DIGITAL JUSTICE AND THE UNCITRAL ODR FRAMEWORK: NORMATIVE FOUNDATIONS, INSTITUTIONAL LIMITS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS. 2026. https://doi.org/10.53704/f1gwwn52

Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. DIGITAL JUSTICE AND THE UNCITRAL ODR FRAMEWORK: NORMATIVE FOUNDATIONS, INSTITUTIONAL LIMITS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-1e8dede5e8e748bee6ee12aa45143ae3/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed

Report a correction

Frozen-version metadata

Research dossiers and documentary relations

Source roles

Bibliographic / original publication source · https://fountainjournals.com/index.php/index/article/view/1517

An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.

Documentary status

Relevance pending

Library

This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.

UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library