An institutional analysis of the historical process and development trend of payments for watershed services in China
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.1007/s43621-026-03460-x
- Authors
- Yurong Wang · Manjiao Yan · Minjun Lan
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Nanjing Agricultural University · Nanjing Institute of Technology · Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Documentary abstract — original language
This study examines China’s Payments for Watershed Services (PWS) from the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949 to the present, drawing on Ostrom’s multi-level analytical framework. From a rule-based perspective, it compares the specific situation and main characteristics of payment for ecosystem services (PES) in China’s watersheds at different historical stages, understands the hierarchy of PWS rules and the interaction between different levels, which helps to grasp the overall framework of PWS and carry out the next stage of high-quality innovation of the PWS system. The results show that since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, China’s PWS system has undergone the establishment and improvement process of ‘from inception to establishment’ and ‘from consolidation to optimization’. The study also finds that China’s watershed ecological compensation payment system boasts a globally leading investment scale, representing 94% of global PWS investment, and extensive implementation coverage, with such programs already launched in 18 provincial-level regions across the country. This stems from a dynamic feedback loop formed by the top-down institutional design and bottom-up practical exploration of the system. The rules of the top-level design lay the foundation for the practice of PES in the river basin, which are reflected in the property rights of river basin resources, river basin management, and the paid use of river basin system services. At the same time, the practice of PWS has promoted the improvement of the top-level design. The elements of PWS have discovered problems in practice and proposed possible solutions in policy reforms. In conclusion, China’s PWS system needs to continue to promote river basin protection legislation, in order to improve the Constitutional-Choice Level; establish a market-oriented and diversified PWS to further innovate at the Collective-Choice Level and Operational Level.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- W7161512262
- DOI
- 10.1007/s43621-026-03460-x
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Scholarship
- Source-reported types
- article
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- CN
- Natural entities mentioned
- River · Watershed · Ecosystem
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1 · Record 2
Documented bibliographic relations
Source-declared references and links; they do not establish legal support or UGLC qualification. Up to 20 outgoing references are displayed.
- openalex:w1533239649 · CITES
- openalex:w1968869144 · CITES
- openalex:w1993688672 · CITES
- openalex:w1996203658 · CITES
- openalex:w1998946773 · CITES
- openalex:w2028749873 · CITES
- openalex:w2031341735 · CITES
- openalex:w2037627831 · CITES
- openalex:w2064963141 · CITES
- openalex:w2067551744 · CITES
- openalex:w2081155979 · CITES
- openalex:w2085094026 · CITES
- openalex:w2112876539 · CITES
- openalex:w2117007311 · CITES
- openalex:w2165724351 · CITES
- openalex:w2168283218 · CITES
- openalex:w2170689222 · CITES
- openalex:w2175008636 · CITES
- openalex:w2792105939 · CITES
- openalex:w2803903381 · CITES
0 incoming references within the detected corpus
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Yurong Wang; Manjiao Yan; Minjun Lan. An institutional analysis of the historical process and development trend of payments for watershed services in China. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03460-x
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Yurong Wang; Manjiao Yan; Minjun Lan. (2026). An institutional analysis of the historical process and development trend of payments for watershed services in China. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03460-x
- Chicago
- Yurong Wang; Manjiao Yan; Minjun Lan. An institutional analysis of the historical process and development trend of payments for watershed services in China. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03460-x
- ISO 690
- Yurong Wang; Manjiao Yan; Minjun Lan. An institutional analysis of the historical process and development trend of payments for watershed services in China. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03460-x
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. An institutional analysis of the historical process and development trend of payments for watershed services in China. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-193de2c1a79e4ca7741ffd0fb92ae284/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version 9dd29ff8c5297c2f · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
- Authors
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
- Year
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
- Identifiers
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
- Source URL
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
- Source-reported author ORCID
- OpenAlex · source · 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
839ffa78a71d6de6 · 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
c72727f07e9af820 · 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
dd150389483bfb18 · 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
9dd29ff8c5297c2f · 2026-11-09T19:14:00.914253+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
CN ·
Nanjing Agricultural University
Nanjing Institute of Technology
Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Source roles
Discovery source · https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03460-x
Discovery source · https://openalex.org/W7161512262
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.