Poking the Dragon: Australia-China Relations and a Truculent Fear of the Racialized 'Other'
Identification
- Public canonical key
- doi:10.25911/mc5g-dr46
- Authors
- Schultz, Jackson
- Reported year
- 2020
- Reported language
- und · en_AU
- Source type
- Thesis (Masters)
- First detected
- 2026-11-09T19:08:03.057197+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-09T19:08:03.057197+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Documentary abstract — original language
Despite the strength and complementarity of economic ties between Australia and China, the contemporary relationship is paroxysmal at best and is marked from an Australian perspective by an increasing and pervasive level of suspicion and antithesization towards its largest trading partner. Consequently, considerations of the 'Thucydides Trap' - where we imagine ourselves being thrust into a calamitous choice between the United States, as our security guarantor, and China, as our largest economic relationship - have rapidly entered the Overton window to become highly popular subjects of both academic and public discourse alike. It is in this way that this paper aims to interrogate this disjuncture and Australia's increasing animosity towards China, in order to contend that while the two countries undoubtedly share dissimilar socio-political organizations, at the heart of frequently tepid relations lies not a difference of ideology, or even of values, but rather an Australian racialized fear of the Other and stubborn hang over commitment to the Anglosphere. This paper will further attest to Australia's anxious security outlook and its foreign policy-making in respect to China as subliminally molded, if not ontologically underpinned, by the dominant proliferation of entrenched Sinophobic racism within Australian society. As such, the contemporary ‘China choice’ and centuries-old ‘Australian dilemma’ - the irreconcilability of Australia’s geography with its history - are all but synonymous: indeed, Australia is really not facing a new problem at all, as buzzwords like the ‘Thucydides Trap’ may suggest, but in reality is blindly continuing along its same racially-predicated ally versus foe conception that it has done since before Federation. Thus, it will be concluded that only by acknowledging the trauma of invasion and its ongoing deleterious effects, through a process of reconciliation and decolonization, can Australia achieve a mature, independent and sustainable foreign policy.
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.25911/mc5g-dr46
- HANDLE
- 1885/293901
- OAI
- oai:openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au:1885/293901
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- Thesis
- Source-reported types
- Thesis (Masters)
- Jurisdictions studied — explicit sources
- AU · CN
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
Repository · Record 1 · Record 2 · Record 3
- DOI · https://doi.org/10.25911/mc5g-dr46
- Handle · https://hdl.handle.net/1885/293901
- Document · https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstreams/c01ab574-6edc-4693-a059-e37341501c3a/download
Documentary field provenance
Source-backed values and values with unresolved provenance are kept separately. Bibliographic provenance validates no legal claim.
- Title
- Documentary source reported
- Publication
- Documentary source reported
- Authors
- Documentary source reported
- Document type
- Documentary source reported
- Jurisdiction
- Studied subject derived from explicit documentary context
- Court
- Not recorded
- Issuing authority
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- DOI
- Documentary source reported
- ISBN
- Not recorded
- Official identifier
- Not recorded
- Source URL
- Documentary source reported
- Source-reported status
- Not recorded
- Amendment / repeal
- Not recorded
Cite this reference
Schultz, Jackson. Poking the Dragon: Australia-China Relations and a Truculent Fear of the Racialized 'Other'. 2020. https://doi.org/10.25911/mc5g-dr46
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Schultz, Jackson. (2020). Poking the Dragon: Australia-China Relations and a Truculent Fear of the Racialized 'Other'. https://doi.org/10.25911/mc5g-dr46
- Chicago
- Schultz, Jackson. Poking the Dragon: Australia-China Relations and a Truculent Fear of the Racialized 'Other'. 2020. https://doi.org/10.25911/mc5g-dr46
- ISO 690
- Schultz, Jackson. Poking the Dragon: Australia-China Relations and a Truculent Fear of the Racialized 'Other'. 2020. https://doi.org/10.25911/mc5g-dr46
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Poking the Dragon: Australia-China Relations and a Truculent Fear of the Racialized 'Other'. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-1126f8bbfe44c66828c1d4e9a8f47b09/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Field provenance and record version
Version c7b27c1be9ff3068 · udtr-reference-1.1.2
- Title
- Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:03.057197+00:00
- Authors
- Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:03.057197+00:00
- Year
- Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:03.057197+00:00
- Identifiers
- Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:03.057197+00:00
- Source URL
- Repository_ANU · source · 2026-11-09T19:08:03.057197+00:00
History tracks record metadata and does not certify the state of the law.
11c37e3599b3f42d · 2026-11-09T19:08:03.057197+00:00
be3f203d2ae2500d · 2026-11-09T19:08:03.057197+00:00
ebdf298167d8dff4 · 2026-11-09T19:08:03.057197+00:00
c7b27c1be9ff3068 · 2026-11-09T19:08:03.057197+00:00
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.25911/mc5g-dr46
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://hdl.handle.net/1885/293901
Institutional bibliographic repository · https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/bitstreams/c01ab574-6edc-4693-a059-e37341501c3a/download
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.