Analysis of the Reformulation of the Minimum Marriage Age: An Islamic Law Perspective on Law No. 16 of 2019 in the Pamekasan Court
Identification
- Public canonical key
- radar:r-0f410c89e25e4eec673768f2f6adcaa3
- Authors
- Moh Sholihin · Jamiliya Susantin
- Reported year
- 2026
- Reported language
- en
- Source type
- article
- First detected
- 2026-11-14T02:30:22.142392+00:00
- Last metadata observation
- 2026-11-14T02:30:22.142392+00:00
- Last HTTP verification
- Not checked
Institutions reported by the source
Universitas Islam Madura
Reported affiliation countries
ID
Documentary abstract — original language
This study aims to analyze the reformulation of the minimum marriage age under Law No. 16 of 2019 through a comparative perspective of Islamic law and positive law, as well as to examine its implications for judicial practice at the Pamekasan Religious Court. This research employs a socio-legal approach, incorporating statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were collected through documentation of marriage dispensation cases from 2019 to 2025 and interviews with judges. The findings indicate that the reformulation of the minimum marriage age to 19 years for both men and women constitutes a progressive measure to strengthen child protection and promote gender equality. However, the amendment has been followed by a significant increase in applications for marriage dispensation, reflecting a gap between legal norms and prevailing social realities. The study also reveals differences between Islamic law, which is grounded in the concepts of baligh, rusyd, and maslahah, and positive law, which establishes a fixed statutory minimum age for marriage. In judicial practice, judges tend to integrate sociological, psychological, and maslahah considerations when deciding marriage dispensation cases. These findings suggest that the impact of the reform on child protection and the prevention of child marriage remains mixed, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive strategy that combines legal reform with broader social interventions.
Identifiers
- OPENALEX
- https://openalex.org/W7167481285
- DOI
- 10.37893/jbh.v15i1.1419
Documentary context
- Documentary family
- article
- Source-reported types
- article
- Publishers
- Universitas Krisnadwipayana
Entity mentions are not evidence of legal recognition. Jurisdiction studied is separate from author affiliation country.
Sources
OpenAlex · Record 1
Cite this reference
Moh Sholihin; Jamiliya Susantin. Analysis of the Reformulation of the Minimum Marriage Age: An Islamic Law Perspective on Law No. 16 of 2019 in the Pamekasan Court. 2026. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v15i1.1419
JSON · CSL-JSON · BibTeX · RIS · CSV · JSON-LD ·
APA, Chicago, ISO 690: bibliographic formats using available fields. OSCOLA / Bluebook: structured data only; full legal citation compliance is not claimed without verification of required elements.
- APA
- Moh Sholihin; Jamiliya Susantin. (2026). Analysis of the Reformulation of the Minimum Marriage Age: An Islamic Law Perspective on Law No. 16 of 2019 in the Pamekasan Court. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v15i1.1419
- Chicago
- Moh Sholihin; Jamiliya Susantin. Analysis of the Reformulation of the Minimum Marriage Age: An Islamic Law Perspective on Law No. 16 of 2019 in the Pamekasan Court. 2026. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v15i1.1419
- ISO 690
- Moh Sholihin; Jamiliya Susantin. Analysis of the Reformulation of the Minimum Marriage Age: An Islamic Law Perspective on Law No. 16 of 2019 in the Pamekasan Court. 2026. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v15i1.1419
Warning: Undefined array key "last_link_verified" in /home/clients/e27d81e12f04d2bfd747aa264540ac56/sites/_UDTR_APP/legal_library_reference.php on line 31
UDTR Global Rights of Nature Legal Library. Analysis of the Reformulation of the Minimum Marriage Age: An Islamic Law Perspective on Law No. 16 of 2019 in the Pamekasan Court. Documentary record: https://www.declarationuniverselledesdroitsdelarbre.org/global-rights-of-nature-radar/reference/r-0f410c89e25e4eec673768f2f6adcaa3/ · Last HTTP verification: not performed
Research dossiers and documentary relations
Source roles
Bibliographic / original publication source · https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v15i1.1419
An authority link alone does not verify a legal claim. Abstracts and full texts remain subject to their source terms.
Documentary status
Relevance pending
Library
This identity is not yet included in the Legal Library.